Page 243 - The Arts of China, By Michael Sullivan Good Book
P. 243

11
                               The Ch'ing Dynasty





      The Ming Dynasty was brought down by the same inexorable
      laws of decay that had operated on previous occasions in Chinese
      history: corruption and the power of the eunuchs at court, leading
      to breakdown of the administration, large-scale banditry in the
      provinces, and an enemy on the northern frontier patiently await-
      ing their opportunity to pounce. In 1618 the Manchu nation had
      been founded on the banks ofthe bleak Sungari River. Seven years
      later the Great Khan, Nurhachi, set up his capital in Mukden, call-
      ing his new dynasty Ch'ing ("pure") to parallel the Chinese Ming
      ("bright"). Their moment came when in 1644 the Chinese general
      Wu San-kuei appealed to them for help to expel the rebel leader Li
      Tzu-ch'eng, who had forced his way into Peking. The Manchus
      promptly accepted, drove Li out of the city and, while Wu San-
      kuei was pursuing him into the west, quietly occupied the capital
      and proclaimed the rule of the Ch'ing Dynasty. Their unexpected
      success left the Manchus momentarily exposed, but Wu San-kuei
      waited ten years before attempting to dislodge them, and then it
      was too late. But for nearly four decades he and his successors held
      South China, which was not finally secured for the Manchus until
      the capture of Kunming in  1 682. As a result of this long civil war
      there grew up a bitter hostility between north and south; Peking
      became increasingly remote and suspicious, the south ever more
      rebellious and independent.
       It would be wrong, however, to picture the Manchus as barba-
      rous and destructive. On the contrary, they felt an intense admi-
      ration for Chinese culture and leaned heavily on the Chinese offi-
      cial class; but the more independent-minded of the Chinese
      intelligentsia remained, as under the Mongols, a potential source
      of danger to the regime, and the Manchu trust of the literati did
      not extend to a sympathetic consideration for the "new thought"
      of the eighteenth century. They clung to the most reactionary
      forms of Confucianism, becoming more Chinese than  the
      Chinese themselves and strenuously resisting up to the end every
      one of the attempts at reform which were made by the literati,
                                                      223
                                                  Copyrighted mater
   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248