Page 57 - Lungshan Pottery Lunshanoid Research 1977 Paper
P. 57

44










                     follow    from including       possibly     interdependent        characters

                     (Appendix B).


                            The  use of a combined program written by R.G. Matson,

                    Dept. of Anthropology and Sociology, the University of

                    British     Columbia,      (for the main program),           J.J. Wood, Dept.

                     of  Anthropology, Northern Arizona University,                    (for the sub-

                    routine of hierachical            grouping), and R.J.          Sampson, (for

                    the   subroutine to       print    dendrogram), permits the quick and

                    accurate     calculation of Jaccard's             coefficient of distance

                    among each pair of          sites and the       efficient grouping of

                    similarity.        The results of the cluster             analysis      (simple

                                                                                            1
                    average) appear        i n the form of a dendrogram             (Fig. 2 ) .
                    "There    is no necessary implication              of •genetic*       relation-

                    ship   i n the dendrogram;         i t should be interpreted           merely

                    as   an indicator of taxonomic distance, not as a family

                    tree"    (Matson & True        1 9 7 0 i  1 2 0 2 ) .  The dendrogram    exhibits

                                                                                       1
                    the   following     patterns*      (cluster I)      sites 14, 3;         (cluster
                                        1
                    II)   sites 18, 2,        11,   10;   (cluster     III)   site   16;    (cluster
                    IV)   sites    17,  15;    (cluster V)      sites 6,     5, 4; (cluster VI)

                    sites    19, 8,    9t 7, 2; and (cluster           VII)   sites 3 and       1.

                    Cluster     I,  II, III and IV show exactly              the same results

                    as  that    of  traditional      classifications.          In other words,
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62