Page 81 - Important Chinese Art Hong Kong April 2, 2019 Sotheby's
P. 81

Fig. 4
                             Jade arched pendant in the shape of a rhinoceros, Western Han dynasty
                             Excavated from the tomb of the King of Nanyue, Guangzhou
                             8.5 cm, 3 1/4  in.
                             © Museum of the Western Han Tomb of the Nanyue King, Guangzhou
                             圖四
                             西漢 犀形玉璜 廣州南越王墓出土
                             8.5 公分,3 1/4  英寸
                             © 廣州西漢南越王墓博物館














                             Fig. 5
                             Line drawing of a bronze vessel, 6th-5th century BC, Eastern Zhou dynasty, in the collection of the Walters Art Museum, Baltimore, MD
                             After: Charles D. Weber, ‘Chinese Pictorial Bronze Vessels of the Late Chou Period. Part IV’, Articus Asiae, 1968, vol. 30, no. 2/3, p. 221, fig. 66f
                             (original drawing mirrored)

                             圖五
                             東周公元前六至五世紀 錯金銀青銅蓋豆 馬利蘭州巴爾的摩華特斯美術館 局部狩獵紋線描圖(原圖水平倒置)
                             出處:Charles D. Weber,〈Chinese Pictorial Bronze Vessels of the Late Chou Period. Part IV〉,《Articus Asiae》,1968年,第30期2/3號,
                             頁221,圖66f


                             The present plaque is the only one of the group depicting the   unlike the feline silhouette of the tiger or the slender, sinuous
                             head of the animal diving far down, as if peering over an edge   body of the dragon. All these attributes would seem to
                             – a stylistic feature that could, however, have been dictated   suggest that the carvers did not have a tiger or dragon in
                             by the shape and markings of the original jade pebble rather   mind, when fashioning these pendants, even though they
                             than by artistic intent. The brown markings around the   may have been referred to as ‘tiger pendants’.
                             edge of the plaque suggest a very astute utilisation of the   A similar but much smaller carving was excavated from a
                             raw material. The edge of the plaque bears a two-character   tomb believed to belong to Zhao Mo, who ruled from 137-122
                             inscription engraved in rudimentary strokes, which so far   BC, during the Western Han dynasty (206 BC – AD 9), as
                             remains undeciphered.
                                                                       King of Nanyue in the far south and was buried at Xianggang,
                             The companion plaques are generally referred to as ‘tiger   Guangzhou, Guangdong province; see Zhongguo chutu
                             plaques’. Jade hu (tigers) are frequently mentioned in   yuqi quanji/The Complete Collection of Jades Unearthed
                             classical texts such as the Zhou li [The rites of Zhou], and   in China, Beijing, 2005, vol. 11, pls 81 and 123, and Nanyue
                             the tiger seems indeed one of the most commonly depicted   wang mu yuqi/Jades from the Tomb of the King of Nanyue,
                             animals. Tiger pendants are known at least since the Shang   Guangzhou, 1991, pls 52, 54 and 55 (fig. 4). This pendant,
                             period (16th century – 1045 BC) and are very common in   which formed part of the King’s elaborate jade pectoral,
                             the Eastern Zhou. The term ‘tiger’ appears, however, to have   shows a very similar silhouette and has been identified as a
                             been retained for these animal pendants, even when the   rhinoceros-shaped huang in Peter Y.K. Lam, ‘Selected Jades
                             tiger form was replaced by sinuous dragons, as is suggested   from an Imperial Nanyue Tomb’, Chinese Jade, op.cit., p. 121,
                             by the appearance of the character hu (‘tiger’) inscribed on   huang being the general term for an arched jade pendant.
                             dragon-shaped pendants (Jessica Rawson, Chinese Jade:   One other related carving, but with almost plain surface
                             From the Neolithic to the Qing, London, 1995, p. 261). A ‘tiger   and probably also slightly later than the present plaque, is
                             pendant’ could therefore apparently have various shapes.  illustrated in Rawson, op.cit., no. 17:13, from the collection of
                                                                       Sir Joseph Hotung.
                             While the animal of the present plaque may be described
                             in the words of Wilson (op.cit., p. 127) as “at once tiger-like,   Depictions of rhinoceros are otherwise rare in this period,
                             rhino-like, and dragon-like”, it certainly differs markedly   but do exist. Since the Shang dynasty, bronze vessels
                             from the usual depictions of tigers and dragons. The most   naturalistically modelled in the shape of a rhinoceros were
                             obvious feature is of course the clearly rendered horn on   created and very realistic examples are known from the
                             the forehead. The snout differs as well, being much more   late Eastern Zhou or early Western Han period (e.g. Peng
                             prominent and broader than usual and ending in a blunt, arc-  Qingyun, ed., Zhongguo wenwu jinghua da cidian. Qingtong
                             shaped tip, quite unlike the curled-up or pointed snouts seen   juan [Encyclopaedia of masterpieces of Chinese cultural
                             both on tiger and dragon plaques. Further, the silhouette   relics. Bronze volume], Shanghai, 1995, pl. 855). Images of
                             of these plaques, with a bulging neck and shoulder section   the animal can also be seen among other beasts in hunting
                             is very characteristic of the rhinoceros and graphically   scenes inlaid in late Zhou bronzes; see Charles D. Weber,
                             captures the physical power of this massive animal, quite   Chinese Pictorial Bronze Vessels of the Late Chou Period,




                                                                                                             79
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86