Page 14 - Women Collectors and the Rise of the Porcelain Cabinet (Collecting history in Europe)
P. 14

Fig. 8                 equipment. The criterion that determined whether   the qualifi cation ‘even if they are made of silver or
              Lacquer panels from    an item counted as Gerade was whether it had been   porcelain’ indicates that other silver and porcelain
              Henriette Amalie von Nassau-
              Diez (1666–1726)’s lacquer   personally used by the woman, had been in her care,   objects were subject to the rules of female inheritance.
              room, from the Stadholder’s   or had been necessary for her work. Things needed
              residence in Leeuwarden.
              China, c.1695, limewood   for the continued running of the household such   The inheritance of porcelain through the female
              and coromandel lacquer.   as beds, washing utensils, cutlery and tableware   line can be illustrated by the example of the House
              Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam,   were excepted, as these could also be of use to a   of Hesse-Kassel. The inventory of the estate
              inv. no. BK-16709
                                     male heir. Furthermore, it was repeatedly stated   of Landgravine Maria Amalia of Hesse-Kassel
                                     that certain objects (e.g. bench and chair cushions,   (1653–1711), wife of Landgrave Charles I, which
                                     curtains and carpets), which had been purchased   was drawn up in 1712, states that at the time of her
                                     to decorate the home, were not part of the Gerade. It   death she owned over 2,600 pieces of mainly East
                                     could therefore be concluded that porcelain vessels –   Asian porcelain. In addition, she owned numerous
                                     since they could either be classifi ed as tableware or as   other Asian luxury items, such as lacquer, Japanese
                                     decorative objects – were not included in the female   paintings and soapstone fi gures. This made the
                                     line of inheritance. Indeed, it is stated under the   Landgravine the ‘owner of one of the largest and
                                     headings Caffeekanne (coffee pot) and Chokoladenkanne   most signifi cant collections of East Asian objects in
                                     (chocolate pot) that these pots ‘even if they are made   Europe’.  Hardly anything is known about where
                                                                                           98
                                     of silver or porcelain (…) belong to the household   or how the collection was presented, but it is safe
                                     contents, but certainly not to the Gerade’  . However,   to assume that a large number of different cabinets
                                                                      97


                                     184                                         CHINESE AND JAP ANESE P ORCELAIN FOR THE DUTCH GOLDEN AGE




                                                                                                                                 07-05-14   16:33
     130850_p                                                                                                                    07-05-14   16:33
     130850_p001_280.indd   184001_280.indd   184
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19