Page 164 - Collecting and Displaying China's Summer Palace in the West
P. 164

10 Yuanmingyuan on Display

                    Ornamental Aesthetics at the
                    Musée Chinois


                    Greg M. Thomas







              Introduction 1
              One of many factors that made the Yuanmingyuan important was its holding of many
              thousands of art objects, most of elite imperial manufacture, that were spread among
              several temple complexes, dozens of residences and audience halls, and dozens more
              buildings used for leisure, administration, and storage. With countless objects des -
              troyed by looters or fire, and with most others scattered among hundreds of soldiers
              and numerous Chinese opportunists, the Chinese Museum (Musée chinois) at the
              Château de Fontainebleau became the largest single fragment of Yuanmingyuan’s
              material culture (see Figures 10.1 and 9.4). Since the British army’s gifts to Queen
              Victoria were interspersed among the Royal Collections, the French gifts to Empress
              Eugénie constitute the only true collection of Yuanmingyuan art, composed into a
              coherent display that reconstructs—partially and grotesquely—an echo of the
              collective material life that inhabited the lost palace grounds. Offering a small glimpse
              into a vast domain, the museum refracts that view through the overlapping lenses of
              imperialism, politics, religion, collecting, craftsmanship, and imagination. Describing
              and explaining this refractive representation of Yuanmingyuan is the central aim of
              this chapter.
                My core challenge is how to interpret a display. To some extent, displays invite
              the same kind of art historical inquiry as paintings or sculptures; we can analyze
              their composition and iconography, their visual and bodily effects, their reception by
              viewers and critics. But two major differences stand out. First, the subject matter of
              a display oscillates between the individual objects on view and the display as a
              collective ensemble. While each object contributes to the ensemble, each is inevitably
              altered by the ensemble as well. So interpretation of the Chinese Museum depends
              on neither the Chinese works of art nor their new environment, but on the dialogue
              between them. Second, the artistic agency of a display is split. Even following a
              patron’s directives, a painter, sculptor, or architect generally controls the design,
              execution, and content of his/her work. The Chinese Museum, in contrast, was the
              product of collective thought and action by the Chinese artists and patrons who made
              each object, the French officers who selected those to give Empress Eugénie, Eugénie
              herself as patron, her chief designer Victor Ruprich-Robert (1820–1887), and his
              team of craftsmen.
                To capture this complexity of both content and creation, the first section of the
              chapter examines the selection of objects at the Yuanmingyuan, the diverse meanings
              and values attributed to them in Paris, Empress Eugénie’s interests in choosing the
   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169