Page 171 - Collecting and Displaying China's Summer Palace in the West
P. 171

156  Greg M. Thomas
              to an English collector during the French Revolution, it turns out Eugénie saw and
              admired two of these very pieces—a cabinet and commode veneered in ebony and
              Japanese black lacquer panels, with ornate ormolu mounts—when she visited Scotland
              in 1860. 28  We will see that this lacquer inspired the main decoration in the Chinese
              Museum.
                A more immediate inspiration came from Queen Victoria, with whom Eugénie
              enjoyed a special relationship. Eugénie and Napoleon got along extremely well with
              Victoria and Albert during Napoleon’s visit to Windsor and London in April 1855
              and Victoria’s reciprocal visit to Paris in August, during the Universal Exposition.
              Victoria advised the pregnant Eugénie on avoiding a third miscarriage, sent an English
              lady to be by her bedside when Prince Napoleon was born in 1856, recommended
              his nanny, corresponded with her, and comforted her in London in late 1860 after
              the death of Eugénie’s sister and just after the Yuanmingyuan was looted. 29  Eugénie
              was also very close to Lord Clarendon, rumored to be her biological father, who was
              Victoria’s Secretary of State 1853–1858. 30  Since my previous publication on the
              museum, I learned that Napoleon and Eugénie were hosted during their 1855 visit
              in Buckingham Palace’s Yellow Drawing Room, decorated in a Chinese manner with
              extravagant objects made by King George IV for the Royal Pavilion at Brighton. 31
              Multiple techniques of display and ornamentation evident there are repeated at the
              Chinese Museum, suggesting a crucial alternative source for Eugénie’s innovative dis -
              play. Considering the Franco-British alliance in China, this direct link to Buckingham
              Palace gave the museum strong national as well as personal meanings.
                A final layer of re-interpretation was the material practice of the museum’s chief
              designer, Victor Ruprich-Robert, an establishment architect and professor of design.
              Trained at the École des Beaux-Arts, he replaced Viollet-le-Duc in 1859 as the
              professor of ornament at the École nationale et spéciale de dessin. Specializing in
              renovating medieval buildings, he was named a knight of the Legion of Honor in
              1861 and led the renovation of the Fontainebleau block where the Chinese Museum
                        32
              was housed. While he had no other experience with non-Western art or architecture,
              two sets of beliefs shaped Ruprich-Robert’s approach to the Yuanmingyuan’s objects.
              First, he argued passionately that successful art—art that achieves unity and poetry—
              requires an inventive creator who can design across the professions of painting,
              sculpture, and architecture and across different media such as plaster, wood, bronze,
              and textiles. 33  In an important 1862 article entitled “The first among decorators is
              the architect,” he cites examples of “le Grand Art” ranging from Greek vases to
              medieval metalwork to Raphael’s loges and asks: “Would we not gladly grant to the
              authors of all these wonders the right to create the entire decoration of our palaces,
              of our homes?” Yes, he says, because they all have something greater than any single
                                    34
              painter or sculptor today. He claims only architects are now capable of such unified
              design, due to their multifaceted training. In his mind, achieving a unified decorative
              effect in the Chinese Museum was key, and that involved bringing French and Chinese
              aesthetics together.
                More germane to the installation’s specific design was his belief that ornament
              is the key ingredient of this universal art of creative unity. His major 1866 book,
              Ornamental Flora, opens with the statement “There is no civilization of which
              posterity has discovered vestiges, without stating among its ruins . . . the art of
              Ornamentation.” 35  He talks about flowers in particular encapsulating both the
              geometry and beauty underlying God’s creation, and emphasizes that his floral
   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176