Page 52 - Oriental Series Japan and China, Brinkly
P. 52
CHINA
A.D. 1200, was Chan-cheng, a district included in
Cochin China. It might be conjectured that speci-
mens of Tu-Ting-yao, included among these imports,
found their way to Japan from Chan-cheng, and
were identified with their port of shipment rather
than with their original place of manufacture, as was
"
the case with the well known " Old ware of
Japan
Western collectors, which, though produced at Arita,
was everywhere called Imari-yaki, after its place of
export (Imari). Against such a theory, however, has
to be set the well established fact that there existed,
during the Sung dynasty, a much brisker direct trade
between China and Japan than between the former
and Cochin China. Indeed, the very author (Chao
Ju-kua) quoted by Dr. Hirth in this context, says that
large Chinese junks were engaged, in his time, trans-
porting timber notably planks of the Cryptomeria
Japonica from Japan to the Chinese port of Ch'iian-
chou, and it is scarcely credible that these junks, on
their return journey, would have failed to bring Chi-
nese keramic wares to Japan, where such objects of
art had been held in high esteem ever since the sev-
enth or eighth century of the Christian era. Of
course a general inference of this sort does not neces-
sarily include a special product like the Tu-Ting-yao.
Specimens of that particular ware may have reached
Japan via Cochin China, and thus been erroneously
attributed to the factories of the latter. Unfortu-
nately the evidence available does not suffice to eluci-
date this matter.
It has to be remembered that when the Sung
dynasty is spoken of there is question of a period of
over three centuries. Under ordinary circumstances,
great progress should have been made in the keramic
30