Page 169 - Jindezhen Porcelain Production of the 19th C. by Ellen Huang, Univ. San Diego 2008
P. 169

152



                       allowed Qianlong to employ methods of archaeology and textual research to made


                       conclusions about porcelain’s origins and dating.  This intellectual excursion certifies

                       Qianlong’s status as the first historian of porcelain.   Moreover, coupled with numerous


                       references to Ming Dynasty literati texts on things and handbooks to “elegant living,” the

                       peculiar focus on the objects’ uniqueness such as material flaws enabled the catalogues to

                       both resonate back with mainstream literati culture previously in vogue as well as


                       distinguish themselves as remnants of a collection of objects belonging to a new, stylized

                                                                                                    27
                       era that pointed completely to an authoritative collector – the emperor Qianlong.

                              In fact, porcelain objects were not the only objects to capture the attention of the

                       rigorous cataloguing, ordering, ranking efforts of Qianlong's court.  In 1752 and 1753 (the

                       17th and 18th years of the Qianlong reign period), he ordered the re-publication of the Bogu

                       tu and the Kaogu tu catalogues that featured bronze antiques, first printed in the Song

                       Dynasty.  Again, each catalogue's visual illustration portrayed a single bronze object, and the

                       pictured object was accompanied by a corresponding page on which textual explanations

                       about the bronze's size, provenance, and decorative details were written.  Also included in the

                                                                                        28
                       cataloguing and visual repertoire were inkstone catalogues (Figure 5).   Like the ceramic
                       catalogues, as Yu Peichin's examination of ceramic objects along with these object

                       catalogues reveal, the illustrated catalogues were records and inventories of actual duobao

                       ges' contents that were part of the Qing emperors' own collections.

                              The tension between adopting the cultural practices of the Ming literati and

                       asserting a Qing presence embodied in the ruler also framed the broader phenomenon of


                       these curio boxes.  As present-day museum holdings demonstrate, and archival records

                       for the Imperial Household show, the Qianlong emperor, the princes, and their


                       households commissioned and collected lacquered boxes, "cabinets of many treasures"
   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174