Page 67 - Jindezhen Porcelain Production of the 19th C. by Ellen Huang, Univ. San Diego 2008
P. 67

50



                       copies of the book, a collectors’ item in its own right: it was silk bound with gilt lettering

                       and included eighty-three pages of descriptive text in Chinese and English and eighty-


                                        99
                       three color plates.   English collector Stephen Bushell had translated the Xiang
                       Yuanbian text into English and annotated the Chinese text in an earlier 1880s version


                       published in London; Guo and Ferguson’s version differed from the original and

                       Bushell’s in that it included a short biography of the Ming collector and colored


                       lithographic portrait of Xiang Yuanbian (Figure 11 and Figure 12).  Later, when writing

                       his comprehensive Survey of Chinese Art, which was published in Shanghai by the


                       Commercial Press in 1939, Ferguson referenced Guo’s personal collection of art and

                       cataloguing abilities.  Clearly, their joint efforts in porcelain and art authentication and


                       publishing had convinced Ferguson of Guo’s abilities such that he vouched for and

                       trusted Guo’s judgment in the authentication and valuation of “art.”

                              Given Guo’s personal history, some of the prevalent themes in his “Brief


                       Description of Porcelain” (Ciqi gaishuo) should be mentioned.  His essay began with the

                       origins of porcelain and the difference between porcelain and pottery, or “ci ନ” and “tao


                       ௗ.”  This was an important issue Guo stressed in a study of a ceramic lute found in the


                       collections of the Palace Museum in 1929.  As Guo defined in 1929 and later echoed in


                       1935, “We must remember that the production of pottery preceded that of porcelain.  The

                       difference between pottery and porcelain objects is found in the material of which they


                       are made and not in the glaze.  The body of pottery vessels is clay; the body of the

                                                                                    100
                       porcelain is decomposed stone found only in certain localities.”   In his porcelain essay,

                       Guo again stressed that “porcelain production can only happen in certain areas” (chan ci

                                       101
                       you yiding quyu).   When Guo wrote these essays, the ceramic wares in vogue in
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72