Page 22 - Christies DEVOTION IN STONE Gandharan Art From a Japanese Collection Sept 23 2020 NYC
P. 22

A Magnificent Dated Buddhist Triad


          Carved in deep relief, with exquisite modeling and lifelike attention to detail,   sa[m] 41 Phagunasa masasa di pamcami Budhanadasa trepidakasa damamukhe
          the present lot can be considered one of the most important and recognizable   madapidarana adhvadidana puyaya bhavatu
          Gandharan sculptures to ever appear at auction. Extensively published and
          widely exhibited, this rare and important Buddhist triad has previously been   (In  the  year  5,  on  the  fifth  day  of  the  month  of  Phalguna:  the  pious  gift  of
          described by Dr Pratapaditya Pal in Light of Asia: Buddha Sakyamuni in Asian   Buddhananda, learned in the three baskets (pitakas), may it be for honoring
          Art, Los Angeles, 1984, p. 191 as “one of the finest extant Gandhara reliefs” ever   the deceased [?] father and mother)
          known to international art historians and the art market. The figures of Buddha
          and his flanking bodhisattvas, Avalokiteshvara and Maitreya, as well as the   Based on an interpretation of the year 5 in the inscription as correlating to the
          boughs of the tree above, are carved with such depth as to appear almost in   Kanishka era, it is dated by Pratapaditya Pal in the “Light of Asia” exhibition
          the round, and the emerging torsos of Brahma and Indra behind contribute to   catalogue to the year 83 CE. Since the time of publication, however, the first
          the sense of deep perspective, a masterful feat on the part of the sculpture   century attribution has been widely debated as too early a date for a stele of
          considering the shallow actual depth of the relief.  this sophistication and subject matter vis-à-vis the current understanding of
                                                              the trajectory of Gandharan sculpture.
          One  of  the  numerous  aspects  which  distinguishes  this  magnificent  triad,
          depicting  Buddha  Shakyamuni  with  a  divine  retinue  of  bodhisattvas,  is  its   Further distinguishing characteristics of this extraordinary sculpture include
          inclusion in a small group of inscribed figural sculpture from the ancient region   the  unusual  and  divine  assembly  of  deities  and  bodhisattvas  surrounding
          of  Gandhara.  As  recently  as  2017,  this  group  of  five  inscribed  figural  works  Buddha  Shakyamuni,  seated  at  the  center  of  the  relief.  In  the  present  lot,
          included  the  present  lot;  a  seated  Buddha  from  Manane  Dheri;  a  standing   Buddha is flanked on the proper left by the bodhisattva Avalokiteshvara, as
          Buddha  from  Loriyan  Tangai;  a  standing  Buddha  from  Hashtnagar;  and  a   evidenced  by  the  diminutive  Buddha  figure  at  the  crown  of  his  head;  and
          standing Hariti from Skarah Dheri, the latter four all commonly known by their   flanked on the proper right by another bodhisattva, likely Maitreya, although
          excavation  site  and subject matter, i.e.  the Loriyan  Tangai Buddha, etc. For   losses  to  the  forearms  preclude  positive  identification  by  attribute.  Behind
          further discussion, see J. Rhi, “Positioning Gandharan Buddhas in chronology:   Buddha  float  two  smaller  figures  with  hands  raised  in  adoration:  crowned
          significant coordinates and anomalies”, Problems of Chronology in Gandharan   Indra on the proper left and an ascetic figure depicting Brahma on the proper
          Art, Oxford, 2018, pp. 35-49 and also C. Luczanits, “Gandhara and its Art”, The   right. Surmounting Buddha and retinue is a heavy bough of luxuriant leaves,
          Buddhist Heritage of Pakistan: Art of Gandhara, New York, 2011, pp. 20-22. The   alternately  described  as  the  famous  bodhi  tree,  or  a  celestial  tree  laden
          present triad, however, has been known colloquially and frequently published   with flowers.
          as the ‘Brussels Buddha’ due to its previous inclusion in the collection of the
                                                              Compare this triad with a very similar relief in the Peshawar Museum depicting
          late Belgian dealer and connoisseur, Claude de Marteau.
                                                              the same scene (published as the “Miracle of Shravashti” in H. Hargreaves,
          Since the initial appearance of the present lot in an advertisement in Oriental   Handbook to the Sculptures of the Peshawar Museum, Calcutta, 1930, pl. 2,
          Art magazine in the spring of 1973, enthusiastic scholastic and epigraphical   fig.  a.).  In  the  Peshawar  example,  the  bodhisattva  Maitreya  flanks  Buddha
          debate  surrounding  the  chronology  and  interpretation  of  Gandharan   on the proper left. Beyond this difference, there is remarkable resemblance
          inscriptions, and the methodology of translation of dated inscriptions into the   between the two triads, including the treatments of the leaves and flowers;
          Gregorian calendar, has followed.                   the elegant hairstyles and cascading style of the robes; the particular crown
                                                              style  of  Indra;  and  the  unusual  treatment  of  the  lotus  throne  petals,  which
          The  primary  question  for  epigraphical  debate  pertains  to  the  correlation  of   resemble an artichoke and are more frequently seen in bronze sculpture from
          era  (i.e.  Kanishka;  Kharoshti;  Azes;  Vikrama,  etc.)  applied  to  the  numerical  the Swat Valley.
          inscription,  which  would  give  a  modern  dating  anywhere  between  the  first
          and fifth centuries CE. Although a median date of third-fourth century CE is
          presently accepted as a working hypothesis by art historians and epigraphical
          specialists,  the  question  of  accuracy  still  remains  a  subject  of  debate.
          Determining the correlation of the inscribed date to the Gregorian calendar
          has a significant and far-reaching effect, of course, on the dating of the present
          lot; the beginning and end of the Kushan era; and the greater understanding of
          the development and evolution of Gandharan art history.
          Writing about the present lot in “Gandhara and its Art”, The Buddhist Heritage
          of  Pakistan:  Art  of  Gandhara,  New  York,  2011,  p.  21,  Christian  Luczanits
          suggests a dating of third-fourth century (232 or 332 CE), based upon the
          premise “… of the Kushan era as beginning with Kanishka I at 127 CE” as well
          as the “… assumption of the development of iconographic themes based on the
          slowly increasing importance of concepts and ideas associated with Mahayana
          Buddhism.”  The  specifically  Mahayanist  iconographic  themes  to  which  he
          refers  includes  the  worship  of  bodhisattvas,  including  Avalokiteshvara  and
          Maitreya, both of whom flank the Buddha in the present lot. Luczanits further
          summarizes: “ .. the interpretations of art history and Buddhist studies on the
          one hand and those of archaeology, history and epigraphy on the other hand
          have been drifting apart, without the possibility of reconciliation.”
          The  inscription  on  the  present  lot  has  been  presented  by  Juhyung  Rhi  in
          “Positioning Gandharan Buddhas in chronology: significant coordinates and   The Miracle at Shravasti; Peshawar Museum, Pakistan, acc. no. 1527;
                                                                  illustrated in H. Hargreaves, Handbook to the Sculptures in the Peshawar
          anomalies”, in Problems of Chronology in Gandharan Art, Oxford, 2018, p. 43.
                                                                  Museum, Calcutta, 1930, pl. 2a.
          and translated as:
          20
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27