Page 123 - Building Digital Libraries
P. 123

CHAPTER 5


                                                   processing with the development of the SRW specification . . . and then, it
                                                   just stopped. While these message-based communication formats still exist
                                                   and are utilized, they are now the exception when developing web-based
                                                   services and programming interfaces.
                                                      Instead, both the library and larger development communities shifted to
                                                   the utilization and creation of RESTful-based services. And this made a lot
                                                   of sense. While most people would find it difficult to describe what REST is,
                                                   they interact with RESTful-based services all the time. HTTP(S) is the most
                                                   common example of a REST-based protocol, which is a stateless protocol
                                                   designed to use URIs to perform a set of predefined actions. When using
                                                   HTTP(S), this would be one of four defined actions: GET, POST, DELETE,
                                                   and PUT—with response to these actions defined by a predefined set of
                                                   HTTP status codes. These codes and actions form the foundation of the
                                                   Internet and the communication between web browsers and Internet service
                                                   providers. Today, most web services are developed to take advantage of the
                                                   HTTP(S) model, utilizing RESTful services and leveraging predefined HTTP
                                                   status codes to denote the success or failure of each operation. By utilizing
                                                   this process, developers can leverage all of the existing tools on the Web and
                                                   be confident that their resources and services will be widely supported.



                                                   SPARQL (SPARQL Protocol and
                                                   RDF Query Language)

                                                   Very simply, SPARQL is a query language that was developed to support
                                                   the semantic web. SPARQL uses the RDF triple concepts of subject, object,
                                                   and predicate to perform SQL-like searches against a semantic data store.
                                                   Presently, SPARQL is primarily used by large organizations like the Getty
                                                   Research Institute or national libraries (like the Japanese Diet Library) to
                                                   provide an interface with their linked data infrastructures.



                                                   SRU (Search and Retrieval via URL)

                                                   SRU represents an XML-based search protocol. SRU was paired with the
                                                   development of SRW (Search and Retrieval via Webservice), and was cre-
                                                   ated to take the place of Z39.50 as the primary method for searching and
                                                   transferring data between library systems. While this format is used within
                                                   the library community, the protocol has never enjoyed the broad use and
                                                   adoption that Z39.50 has had and still maintains.



                                                   Code Management
                                                   Not too long ago, it was very difficult to imagine cultural heritage organiza-
                                                   tions as engines for software development. While these organizations have
                                                   always had “developers” that have created local projects and systems, these



            108
   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128