Page 29 - EVOLUTION OF THE SUDAN PEOPLE’S LIBERATION MOVEMENT(SPLM),
P. 29

2.3 Characteristics of national liberation movements in Africa and theoretical perspective

          The national armed liberation struggle against European colonial rule in Africa took place in the context of
          nationalism and cold war. Many of the struggles were supported by the former Soviet Union and Peoples

          Republic  of China.  Both  incorporated  Marxist-Leninist.  Secondly, there  was greater  emphasis  on the
          centrality of the state in development and social transformation (Hyden, 2006, Ntalaja,1984).

          It was and is believed that after capturing state power, they could bring about radical transformation. What
          is more, they were popular movements inspired by high levels of popular participation, discipline and

          obedience to the national liberation movement.  Popular participation and legitimacy are therefore assumed
          to be an integral part of the struggle against oppressive colonial regimes and not conferred through an
          election. Finally, all national liberation movements considered socialism as the likely acceptable outcome

          of the struggle. The latter assumes that there were certain entitlements and policies expected to be pursued
          by the national liberation movements once in power. Such policies were aimed at socializing gains of the
          struggle and advance public good. It is the promise of public good and socialism that made the national
          liberation movements popular and appealing to the hearts and minds of the people (Ntalaja,1984).


          All the national liberation  movements notwithstanding the similarities  have some differences that are
          specific to the movement and its traditions. The common denominator and central to the national liberation
          movements is the capture of state power and transition to socialism through social transformation. Although
          many of the national liberation movements waged armed struggle, Melber concludes that they became
          part of the problems and many of the issues they fought for became aspirational even after capturing state

          power. Although his studies are confined to Southern Africa, his conclusions are generalizable. He observes
          that the promised good life becomes a mirage or far-fetched as they concede too much ground to the forces
          of capitalism that they have been fighting against during the national liberation struggle. Such concessions,

          argues Cabral led to neo-colonial political settlement and leadership that emerged became anti-people. It is
          therefore not a surprise that all national liberation movements ended up compromising into a neo-colonial
          rule and post phoned the essence of the struggle leading to personal or authoritarian rule that did not allow
          other political players to come in or deliberately distorted history into a single narrative of the dominant
          party.


          Hippler (2005) observes that national liberation movements had a nationalist agenda and national project that
          had five core tasks. It sought to build a competitive national economy and promotion of social integration.
          Furthermore, it sought to construct collective identity and safe guard for sovereignty and territorial integrity.

          It sought legitimacy and consolidation of state power (Keating, 2005:65). Yash Tandon(2009)posits that
          although national project was informed by struggle against colonialism, it could not however be reduced
          to the colonial question alone. It is equally applicable to other non-colonial situations such as autocratic
          regimes by Africans themselves. The first stanza was however about seeking political kingdom first as

          Kwame Nkrumah noted (Mazrui, 1999).  Therefore, liberation movements engaged in national projects
          aimed at forging national consciousness out of people of different ethnic, class, and gender, religious and
          generational differences otherwise known as nation building. The agenda of nation building is otherwise
          articulated or understood as national question even though it is much wider and has other concerns.


          The  answer to national  question  argues Ntalaja  (1987:43) requires  a theoretical  discussion of nation
          problematic  and posed the following questions: what is a nation?  Are there nations in  Africa?  Are
                                                           23
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34