Page 7 - FSUOGM Week 17 2022
P. 7

FSUOGM                                       COMMENTARY                                            FSUOGM



                           The Power of Siberia 2, and by extension the  copper mine, Mongolia would be bearing heavy,
                         Soyuz-Vostok pipeline, has a capacity compa-  possibly unjustified cost burdens, but make just
                         rable to that of the suspended Nord Stream 2  enough for the project to break even, while not
                         projects of about 50bn cubic metres a year and  being able to secure long-term benefits such as
                         is well-positioned to bring the Yamal peninsu-  scalable discounted gas supplies. Accordingly,
                         la’s production, which was originally destined  negotiating on the transit fees, gas prices and
                         for European markets, to China, thus complet-  project funding in an information asymmetry
                         ing the unification of Russia's gas transmission  will be detrimental to Ulaanbaatar’s interests.
                         network.                               Moreover, there is little reason to believe
                                                              that Mongolia will be able to shield itself from
                         Tough bargaining                     the political and geo-technical risks of Soyuz-
                         In spite of having no expertise in developing  Vostok, where a suspension of gas transmission
                         natural gas pipelines, until now Ulaanbaatar has  could delay cash-flows, devalue Ulaanbaatar’s
                         not engaged any third-party advisors in evaluat-  investment and further indebt it. Political risks in
                         ing the technical and financial feasibility of the  this case do exist, not only from the Russian side,
                         Soyuz-Vostok project. At the same time, Mon-  which continues to block Mongolia’s attempts
                         golia’s political leadership and Gazprom do not  to build indigenous hydropower generation
                         seem to be interested in involving a third party in  capacity, but also from China, which has a habit
                         the project, which could arguably increase trans-  of closing borders and applying diplomatic pres-
                         parency, provide additional capital and allow for  sure on Mongolia every time the Dalai Lama
                         greater scrutiny of the financial, engineering and  visits at the invitation of Mongolian Buddhists.
                         environmental aspects.                 With the energy exports to the Western coun-
                           As a result, Gazprom appears to have locked  tries set to decrease, Putin’s urge to accelerate
                         in Erdenes Mongol for a pre-determined set of  infrastructure connections to Eastern markets
                         technical and financial parameters, which will  gives China a bargaining chip for a discounted
                         allow it to shift the unwarranted amount of total  pipeline gas supply deal. This new geopolitical
                         project cost onto the Soyuz-Vostok while leaving  reality will put pressure on Gazprom to squeeze
                         itself, or the Power of Siberia 2 pipeline, the lion’s  the most it can get out of the Soyuz-Vostok pipe-
                         share of the net profits.            line, and leave Mongolia at a disadvantage.
                           Without a proper evaluation of the project   Under the current circumstances, the risks of
                         and third-party involvement, Mongolia is likely  agreeing to a deal with Gazprom entail increased
                         to take on a sizable loan from Russia, possibly  dependency of Mongolia on both Russia and
                         on predatory terms, to finance its portion of the  China without meaningful economic benefits
                         costs, while agreeing to pay it off from the gas  while further exposing itself to political risks and
                         transit fees. In this scenario, ironically similar  potential pressure on sovereign domestic matters
                         to the Soviet-era development of the Erdenet  from its neighbours. ™

                                                                                                  Source: Gazprom.









































       Week 17  26•April•2022                   www. NEWSBASE .com                                              P7
   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12