Page 12 - GLNG Week 03 2021
P. 12

GLNG                                          COMMENTARY                                               GLNG





























                         Ltd (OVL). The Russian company’s CEO, Igor  What next?
                         Sechin, told a conference in September 2019  While the pandemic and the slump in interna-
                         that the consortium members had “made a deci-  tional gas prices have capped Russia’s LNG ambi-
                         sion” to build the plant. But a formal FID is still  tions for the time being, many other producers
                         pending. Sechin said before the pandemic that  have also delayed adding extra supply in light of
                         the group was targeting first gas in 2027, but the  the crisis. This means Russia is less likely to lose
                         coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis has altered the  out on future market share.
                         timeframe, Vostok said.               Only one FID was taken on new liquefaction
                           Sechin also said earlier this year that its  capacity in 2020, in stark contrast to the record
                         Vostok Oil project in the Arctic could one day  level of approvals in the previous year, when
                         deliver some 50mn tpy of LNG to market. But  some 70mn tpy of extra supply was cleared for
                         this is only an aspiration, as further appraisal  development. US operator Sempra Energy took
                         work is needed to determine Vostok Oil’s pro-  an FID on the first phase of its Energia Costa
                         duction capacity.                    Azul (ECA) LNG terminal on Mexico’s Pacific
                           Rosneft has been trying unsuccessfully  coast last November.
                         to advance LNG projects for many years. A   The exception is Qatar, which is pushing
                         previous plan to liquefy gas in the northern  ahead with a massive expansion project at its
                         Timan-Pechora region, known as Pechora LNG,  North Field without having taken a formal FID,
                         was axed in 2018, as Rosneft lacked the gas sup-  undeterred by market challenges. Development
                         plies to underpin it.                drilling began in March last year at the North
                           Gazprom has had similar difficulty in LNG,  Field East (NFE) project, which will ramp up
                         and the 11mn tpy Sakhalin LNG plant on Sakha-  the country’s liquefaction capacity from 77mn
                         lin Island, launched in 2009, remains its only  to 110mn tpy. First gas is expected by 2025. The
                         export terminal in operation. The Russian com-  North Field South (NFS) project will raise out-
                         pany did not join the project until 2006, at which  put further to 126mn tpy by the late 2020s.
                         point development was already well underway,   Russia’s low costs give it an edge in the compe-  Rosneft has
                         replacing Royal Dutch Shell as operator.  tition for LNG market share. Novatek’s Gyetvay
                           There have been on-again, off-again plans to  said in December that the company was able to   been trying
                         add a third train at Sakhalin LNG for years, to  deliver LNG into north-east Asian markets for   unsuccessfully
                         boost its capacity by 50%. But there are concerns  “a little over” $3 per mmBtu. This sum, he said,
                         that Gazprom lacks the necessary gas supply.  comprises a $0.07 cost of feedgas, $0.43 in liq-  to advance LNG
                           One of the company’s main focuses now is  uefaction costs, and between $2.0 and $2.5 in
                         the construction of an LNG production and gas  shipping costs.            projects for many
                         processing complex at the Baltic port of Ust-  The Russian LNG sector’s vulnerability lies
                         Luga. It originally wanted to build an LNG plant  in its heavy reliance on foreign equipment and   years.
                         only, in partnership with Shell, but it decided to  technology, however. Vostok surveyed some
                         build processing facilities as well last year.  200 respondents from engineering and design
                           The Anglo-Dutch major promptly quit, over  companies, operators of small and large LNG
                         the change in the project’s scope and Gazprom  productions, technical specialists, contractors,
                         bringing on board privately owned Rusgazdo-  suppliers and producers of equipment. Some
                         bycha as a partner. Rusgazdobycha’s founder  21% pointed to technical and technologies chal-
                         Arkady Rotenberg, a close ally of Russian Presi-  lenges – namely the lack of domestic equipment
                         dent Vladimir Putin, has been blacklisted under  manufacturing and technology.
                         the US sanctions regime.              Russia has been striving to localise equipment
                           In a report released in Q3 2020, Gazprom  and technology in recent years, but the results
                         said the Baltic plant’s first train would start up  from this poll suggest there is still a lot more
                         in 2024, followed by its second in 2025.  work to be done.™



       P12                                      www. NEWSBASE .com                        Week 03   22•January•2021
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17