Page 5 - DMEA Week 30
P. 5

DMEA                                         COMMENTARY                                               DMEA
















































                         time – more than 10 years, in fact. At the same  (NAPE), made that argument last week. Speak-
                         time, international oil companies (IOCs) have  ing during a virtual workshop, he urged Abuja to
                         also been eager to see Nigeria establish a new  take concrete action for the sake of the country’s
                         legal regime covering all facets of the oil and  oil and gas industry.
                         gas industry. This is partly because they are   “[The] Nigerian government’s failure to
                         keen to ensure the stability of their contracts,  approve the PIB has stalled investment in the
                         but it is also because they are anxious about the  exploration of oil and gas industry in the coun-
                         changes that the government made last year to  try, as only the NNPC is operating. This is not
                         the Deep Offshore and Inland Basin Produc-  good for the industry,” he declared. “The indus-
                         tion Sharing Contract Act, which governs off-  try, especially the upstream [sector], needs a lot
                         shore oilfields.                     of palliatives, waivers and stimulus to operators
                           Their anxiety is not unfounded. Nigeria’s  to enable them to sustain employment. We need
                         government appears to have amended that leg-  [the] government to put policies in place to get
                         islation in a bid to bolster its claim to more than  things done properly.”
                         $62bn in purportedly lost revenues. But this sum   The NAPE president indicated that he did not
                         pales next to the amount that Nigeria may have  share Sylva’s patience with the slow pace of delib-
                         lost as a result of dragging its feet on the PIB.  erations on the PIB. The government has actively
                           Four years ago, the Nigeria Extractive Indus-  alienated investors by not adopting a new oil law
                         tries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) argued  in good time, he argued.
                         in a policy brief that the lack of an oil law had   “Exploration is expensive, especially here.
                         already cost the country around $200bn worth  So as an investor, if I don’t see any seriousness
                         of oil revenue – and had contributed to a decline  in the government to show how safe my invest-
                         of more than 14% in crude production between  ment will be, I will keep [my money] elsewhere,”
                         2012 and 2016. Presumably the losses have only  he said. “Until [the] PIB is passed, investors will
                         grown larger since then.             continue to look elsewhere to invest. So there is
                                                              no better time than now to [collaborate] on this
                         Remaining obstacles                  issue and get the bill passed.”
                         In other words, the failure to update the oil   Tarka does have a point. If Nigeria is able to
                         law still appears to be the biggest obstacle to  put the PIB into effect before the end of this year,
                         investment.                          it is likely to attract more interest to its next off-
                           Alex Tarka, the president of the Nigerian  shore licensing round, which is due to take place
                         Association of Petroleum Explorationists  next year. ™




       Week 30   30•July•2020                   www. NEWSBASE .com                                              P5
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10