Page 6 - AfrElec Week 04 2022
P. 6

AfrElec                                    CLIMATE FINANCE                                            AfrElec


       Africa loses out





       over access to





       climate funding







         AFRICA          MANY African states are struggling to access   The idea that “developed” countries should
                         money earmarked by global institutional inves-  give climate finance to “developing” nations is
                         tors to prepare them to combat climate change.  enshrined in the UN Framework Convention
                           Many African states are struggling to access  on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Many see it as
                         money earmarked by global institutional inves-  an issue of climate justice, based on historical
                         tors to prepare them to combat climate change.  responsibility for global warming.
                           A study published in the journal Global Envi-  A commitment by wealthy nations to give
                         ronmental Change warned that nearly half of the  collectively $100bn in climate finance a year by
                         world’s most climate-vulnerable nations, from  2020 was a core element of the Paris Agreement,
                         Haiti to Afghanistan, missed out on the first  yet they are not expected to reach this goal until
                         round of grants for adaptation projects from the  2023.
                         UN’s Green Climate Fund (GCF).         The 2023 date was finally agreed at COP26 in
                           Overall, the study found that 54% of adap-  Glasgow in November.
                         tation funds in the first GCF allocation period   The GCF was established under  the
                         went to small islands, LDCs and African coun-  UNFCCC as a key part of this effort. It is man-
                         tries. This means that, by its own measure, the  dated to mobilise funds for cutting emissions
                         body has succeeded in distributing half of its  and adapting to global warming in developing
                         money to vulnerable states.          countries, with a particular focus on those with
                           The study’s authors, Matthias Garschagen  low incomes and high climate vulnerability.
                         and Deepal Doshi, set out to assess whether the   Adaptation projects, such as planting trees
                         initial round of GCF adaptation funding had  to prevent the expansion of deserts or building
                         succeeded in its goal of helping the most vulner-  flood defences, are particularly important for
                         able nations.                        global-south nations, which tend to be more
                           The researchers examined the $2.5bn in  vulnerable to climate impacts. So far, adaptation
                         adaptation finance provided between 2015 and  has been severely underfunded.
                         2019 to 84 of the 154 countries that are eligible
                         for GCF funds. This is roughly half the total, with  Missing countries
                         the remainder going on projects to cut emis-  In their study, Garschagen and Doshi high-
                         sions, such as installing renewable power.  lighted the lack of more detailed prioritisation
                           African nations were particularly badly  as an issue with the GCF’s approach, and try to
                         affected, with no money going to projects in  identify the “most vulnerable” countries in their
                         13 of the 30 “least developed” states across the  analysis.
                         continent.                             The researchers analysed recipient nations’
                                                              level of vulnerability to climate change in a more
                                                              granular fashion, using existing indices, and
                         GCF                                  their institutional capacity using data from the
                         The largest fund of its kind, GCF was explicitly  World Bank. They then ranked countries on a
                         created to help the parts of the world that are  spectrum of vulnerability from very high to low.
                         most exposed to climate hazards. It handed out   Using this ranking, they found that 16 of the
                         more than $5bn during its first wave between  37 nations categorised as most vulnerable to
                         2015 and 2019, contributing to wealthy nations’  climate change had not received GCF project
                         wider climate finance obligations.   funding.
                           The fund says its portfolio of projects has   Among them were countries affected by con-
                         roughly doubled in value since the new study’s  flict, such as Afghanistan and Yemen, and some
                         cut-off date in 2019 and “huge strides” have been  of the lowest-income states in the world, such as
                         taken to improve access since then.  Burundi and the Central African Republic.
                           Some vulnerable nations are still yet to receive   The researchers also found that the share of
                         adaptation support, Carbon Brief reported,  adaptation funds was “surprisingly small” for
                         because of the lack of resources, data and infra-  certain country groupings. Notably, 13 of the
                         structure continue to restrict access.  30 LDCs in Africa did not receive any project



       P6                                       www. NEWSBASE .com                        Week 04   27•January•2022
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11