Page 8 - AsiaElec Week 23 2022
P. 8

AsiaElec                                         NUCLEAR                                             AsiaElec




       Japanese court orders Hokkaido





       Electric not to restart Tomari NPP





        ASIA             JAPAN’S Sapporo District Court has ordered  capable of engaging in discussions on safeguards
                         that the reactors at the Tomari NPP should  against earthquakes, tsunami and volcanoes
                         remain offline.                      with NRA inspectors.
                           Hokkaido Electric had been hoping to restart   In his ruling, Judge Taniguchi said the power
                         the plant, as surging fuel costs for thermal power  company has “not provided evidence of the
                         plants have pushed down its revenues, Nuclear  safety” of used nuclear fuel stored at the plant
                         Engineering International reported.  and that the plant does not have adequate protec-
                           Presiding Judge Tetsuya Taniguchi cited  tion against a tsunami. He added that the court
                         safety concerns in the ruling, siding with a  had decided in January to terminate the hearing
                         request by more than 1,000 plaintiffs from the  as the utility was not expected to be able to pro-
                         area who raised concerns there are not sufficient  vide evidence for its claims in the foreseeable
                         safeguards to protect it from natural disasters.  future. However, Hokkaido Electric Power said
                           “A sea wall required under the nuclear regu-  it cannot accept the ruling and will “promptly”
                         lations does not exist,” Taniguchi said. However,  file an appeal. The company said in a release that
                         he dismissed the plaintiffs’ demand for decom-  it had repeatedly explained to the court the safety
                         missioning the plant, saying there is no specific  of the plant from both scientific and technical
                         circumstance that would warrant it.  standpoints.
                           All three units at Tomari NPP have pressur-  Earlier, other district courts ordered the sus-
                         ised water reactors. Units 1 and 2 are 579MWe  pension of the Ohi nuclear NPP’s units 3 and 4
                         and unit 3, which only began commercial oper-  units in Fukui Prefecture (May 2014), and Tokai
                         ation in 2009, is 912MWe. Together they account  unit 2 located in Ibaraki Prefecture (March
                         for about 25% of Hokkaido Electric Power Co’s  2021). However, the order on the Ohi plant was
                         installed (gross) capacity, and about 40% of its  subsequently overturned by a high court and
                         total generated electricity.         the Tokai 2 case is still pending. As of April, 34
                           The three reactors were taken offline between  lawsuits are being fought over nuclear plants at
                         April 2011 and May 2012 for regular checks  district courts and high courts across Japan.
                         and have remained idle since. Hokkaido Elec-  The court ruling on Tomari NPP cannot force
                         tric applied for a restart in 2013, soon after  the plant to halt operations unless it is finalised at
                         the more stringent reactor regulations were  a higher court, but it could impact the ongoing
                         enforced by the government following the Fuk-  assessment by the NRA. The lawsuit was filed
                         ushima nuclear disaster. The Nuclear Regulation  in 2011 and dragged on as Hokkaido Electric
                         Authority (NRA) has meanwhile been assess-  repeatedly failed to argue its case with credible
                         ing whether the reactors meet the new safety  documentation. The court abruptly ended the
                         standards.                           hearings in January, despite the utility’s earlier
                           However, it is not clear when the assessment  pledge that it would prove the plant’s safety by
                         will end as NRA says the utility lacks experts  February.™





























       P8                                       www. NEWSBASE .com                           Week 23   08•June•2022
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13