Page 12 - EurOil Week 04 2023
P. 12

EurOil                                            POLICY                                               EurOil






       OPINION: Bulgaria sets itself a tough task




       with Burgas-Alexandroupolis pipeline revival




        BULGARIA         THE current energy deficit in Europe caused  Burgas’s gas consumption level is not that high,
                         by Russia’s military intervention in Ukraine  and Bulgaria would have to buy additional crude
       The current energy   pushed energy-poor Balkan and Eastern Euro-  oil on the global market, deliver it to Greece, and
       deficit in Europe caused   pean countries to seek alternative sources of  pay transfer fees.
       by Russia’s military   crude oil and natural gas. Countries like Bul-  Also, the oil-carrying tankers are supposed
       intervention in Ukraine   garia and Serbia have already inked agreements  to cross Turkey’s straits, which continuity may
       pushed energy-poor   with Azerbaijan, Turkey and Hungary to receive  be subject to potential political disputes between
       Balkan and Eastern   additional volumes of natural gas and crude oil.  Sofia and Ankara in future. In such scenar-
       European countries to   However, it is insufficient to meet the growing  ios, Ankara may halt or limit the passage of oil
       seek alternative sources   energy consumption.         tankers through its maritime territories. More-
       of crude oil and natural   As such, amid the EU’s embargo on Rus-  over, additional infrastructure works for the
       gas.              sian oil and gas, Bulgaria is looking to revive  pipeline revival would require significant state
                         a trans-Balkan oil pipeline project stretching  investments, creating additional challenges for
                         from the Greek port of Alexandroupolis on the  Bulgaria.
                         Aegean Sea to Bulgaria’s Black Sea port of Burgas   The initial pipeline agreement clearly out-
                         to secure non-Russian crude oil supplies for its  lined the Russian supply sources and benefi-
                         only oil refinery on the Black Sea, controlled by  ciaries, whereas the renewed agreement still
                         Russia’s Lukoil.                     needs to specify these factors. Indeed, Bulgaria’s
                           The renewed debates regarding the post-  enthusiasm for reviving the long-awaited pipe-
                         poned pipeline project intensified amid the ris-  line project is attributed to its efforts to decrease
                         ing fees for oil transits through the Bosphorus  dependence on Russian fossil fuels. Therefore,
                         strait. Indeed, the growing discontent in the  Bulgaria is desperately seeking alternative
                         Balkans with the EU’s embargo on oil and gas  sources to supply its oil refineries with necessary
                         led to Sofia asking for and being granted a two-  raw materials, just like Serbia does. For example,
                         year exemption from the EU’s ban on Russian  as of today, Serbia’s NIS, partly owned by Russia’s
                         crude imports until 2024. Hence, given the cur-  Gazprom (51%), operates two main oil refiner-
                         rent level of negotiations between Athens and  ies and is eyeing the opportunity to build a 128
                         Sophia, a new agreement will likely be signed in  km-long interconnector via Druzhba pipeline
                         the coming weeks.                    with the support of Hungary to import more
                           The initial oil pipeline project emerged in  Russian crude oil. Considering that the Druzhba
                         2007 and entailed the delivery of approximately  pipeline is exempted from the EU’s embargo list,
                         50mn tonnes of Russian crude oil to Greece via  it eases Belgrade’s access to Russian crude oil via
                         Bulgaria annually. The project’s cost was esti-  Hungary.
                         mated at around €1bn and intended to shorten   In light of the global energy and economic
                         the oil export route to Greece and avoid the Bos-  crisis and regional disputes such as Greece-Tur-
                         phorus strait.                       key and the Bulgarian government’s dissatisfac-
                           Russia’s leading energy companies – Trans-  tion with Ankara’s deep engagement with the
                         neft, Rosneft, and Gazprom — secured 51%  ethnic Turkish political figures in the country,
                         of the pipeline project via the established Bur-  the final consensus on the Burgas-Alexandroup-
                         gas-Alexandroupolis Pipeline Consortium joint  olis pipeline is likely to happen in the middle
                         venture, though the project has never been fully  of 2023. As such, Ankara’s recent decision to
                         implemented, as Bulgaria abandoned it in 2012  increase tariffs for oil tankers using the Bospho-
                         officially following a local referendum over envi-  rus and Dardanelles passages that quintupled to
                         ronmental concerns, in fact, due to the US pres-  $4 per tonne of oil gave a strong boost to the pro-
                         sure to prevent the country from deeper energy  ject. The new tariffs enabled Turkey to increase
                         cooperation with Russia.             its revenue from transit fees from $40mn to
                           Nevertheless, Bulgaria urgently needs to  $200mn annually.
                         secure enough non-Russian crude to keep oper-  While the talks with Greece regarding the
                         ations running at the 196,000 barrels per day  pipeline project proceed, Bulgaria apprehends
                         (bpd) Black Sea refinery, providing over 75% of  that it has a limited time to find a permanent
                         the fuels for the local market. However, Bulgaria’s  solution to ensure oil flow to the country to
                         plans to revive the 300 km-long pipeline and its  replace Lukoil. Failure to implement the project
                         extension north to the ports of Varna and Con-  by 2024 would have harsh repercussions for Bul-
                         stanta would be economically unprofitable and  garia in terms of the energy deficit and economic
                         problematic in terms of logistics. For example,  crisis in light of deepening anti-EU rhetoric. ™



       P12                                      www. NEWSBASE .com                        Week 04   26•January•2023
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17