Page 93 - Biblical Backgrounds student textbook

137
but they did own sandals that were likely made of sheepskin or cowhide. In diaspora, the situation
varied; for example, those in Egypt (both men and women) might have well been exposed to the
wearing of knee-high garments and skirts. There was no considerable change for the Jews’ housing
structure from the time of their restoration (previous chapter). For those in diaspora, it depended on
where they found themselves; either in urban or rural places. It was similar for those in Babylonia.
Meanwhile, limited information is available for those in other territories.

As far as the effects of Hellenization are concerned, one positive can be picked out; the translation of
the Hebrew scriptures in Alexandria (the Septuagint) availed a copy of God’s Word for those in diaspora.
With Greek becoming the lingua franca (main language of the lands), this translated Word of God was
now understandable to the many in diaspora. These developments helped the spreading of the gospel in
the Apostles era. Jews in diaspora whose language was replaced now had a common language with
those in Judah.

Trade and economics

The setup of many Greek centers, whether in the Seleucid of Ptolemaic dynasties, was pretty much the
same. They were both propagators of Hellenization. An aristocracy (a group of the Greek elite)
surrounded the rulers. This group owned land and slaves and held key industries and properties.
Mining and farming constituted the spine of industry. It necessitated other industries such as textile,
production of Papyri, and metal work. Meanwhile, an oil industry flourished in Palestine. Both the
Seleucids and Ptolemies endeavored to introduce new plant species to enhance timber and fruit
production. Although production was increasing, there were fewer inventions as production was mainly
dependent on the manual labor of the slaves. Temples also played an important role in the economy as
they generated taxes.

As already indicated, an economic barrier existed between the peasants and the upper-class. The ruling
upper-class controlled taxes and revenues. Almost always, their focus was on the generation of revenue
and barely on the welfare of an average person. This left the peasants of the society and underprivileged
subjects in an impoverished state. Hatred and revolts against the ruling class was an obvious result. This
dislike is even reflected in the gospels when the Romans took over the system.

137 Vos, H. F. (1999). Nelson’s new illustrated Bible manners & customs: how the people of the Bible really lived (p.
362). Nashville, TN: T. Nelson Publishers.

92