Page 134 - Acts Student Textbook
P. 134

had promised Paul would go to Rome, and that promise would not be defeated by an animal. This
               shows the futility of the superstitious attempts of people to interpret events as omens. These people
               were obviously superstitious; yet many people today, in our supposedly enlightened generation, are
               just as superstitious. Sometimes “religious people” are among the worst. They interpret good events
               as indications that they are in God’s favor, and bad events as signs God is displeased with them.
               Often good people suffer more in this life than evil people, and evil people may be blessed physically
               above good people. Our ultimate rewards from God come after this life, not during it. Events here
               are not intended to reveal God’s will to us. True, some events are blessings from God, but you cannot
               read His will or favor by observing signs.

               This experience would have been frightful for anyone, but Luke tells it calmly and factually, showing
               that his intent was not to be sensational. Had some modern faith healer done what Paul was about
               to do, he would have shouted it from the housetop. Also note that Paul, as an apostle and preacher,
               did not consider himself above menial labor. He was working to bring wood for the fire just like
               everyone else. Some preachers and religious leaders seem to think they are too good to do menial
               tasks. We must maintain our priorities on the most important work, but when work needs to be done
               and we are available, we should be willing to do our part. Pratte here make an interesting argument,
               “Some have claimed this could not have been a poisonous viper, since vipers bite but do not
               normally fasten onto their victims. However, the people of the island surely knew best about the
               snakes on their island, and they expected Paul to drop dead from the bite (v6). Whatever the reason
               why the snake fastened on Paul’s hand, it was definitely a poisonous snake and it definitely did bite
               Paul. By fastening on Paul’s hand, it proved beyond doubt that it had bitten Paul and that it had
               plenty of opportunity to inject its venom into him. No one who saw the event doubted what had
               happened. The only people who doubt the record are the skeptics who were not there and refuse to
                                             92
               admit the accuracy of Scripture.”

               How was God’s power evident through Paul in the snake attack, and what implication did that
               bring? (28:5, 6)

               Despite the obvious threat to his life, Paul shook the viper off into the fire and was not in any way
               harmed. This miracle is an express fulfillment of Mark 16:18. However, Paul did not deliberately
               choose to handle a viper to prove his power, like some modern snake-handling faith healers. The
               situation occurred by the course of nature; but God protected Paul and, in so doing, worked a great
               miracle to teach the people. The people of the island expected Paul to swell up from the bite and
               drop dead. But when they saw he was not harmed as they expected, they changed their minds and
               concluded he was a god. Like the heathen in Acts 14:11, they swung from one extreme to another.
               Their first judgment was wrong, and so was their second. They failed to consider that Paul could have
               power granted him by God without himself being a god. Paul had apparently done no miracle on the
               voyage (other than prophesying the future). However, here he began a series of miracles that proved
               his inspiration to the islanders and his fellow travelers.

               How was the manifestation of God’s power evident in the second incident at Malta and what were
               the implications? (28:7-10)

               The ship had wrecked close to the property of the chief man of the island, named Publius. This man
               was very generous and hospitable to the unfortunate people, and entertained them with courtesy
               for three days. This was doubtless quite a feat considering the great number of them (though it is
               possible the term “us” refers only to Paul’s company, since the people obviously thought him so
               special). However, Publius’ father was sick from fever and dysentery (inflammation of the bowels
               resulting in hemorrhaging, etc.). Paul went in to him, laid hands on him, prayed, and healed him.

                      92  Ibid, (p. 387).
                                                           133
   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139