Page 18 - Masters Sample Courses
P. 18

Unbridled hoopla attended the unveiling of a 47-million-year-old primate
               skeleton at the American Museum of Natural History in New York on May 19,
               1983.  Ida was hailed as the missing link and the “eighth wonder of the
                      12
               world.”   Ida turned out to be the fossil of a lemur, lacking only a grooming
               claw and a row of fused teeth.

                                        Tiktaalik
                                        Despite substantial differences between the fossilized
                                        fish Tiktaalik (supposed 380 Million years ago) and terrestrial tetrapods,
                                        many evolutionists insist Tiktaalik was a transitional form. However, the
                                        fleshy fins of Tiktaalik do not attach to the bony pelvis and so could not
                                        support weight for walking. Furthermore, the bones in the fins of these fossil
                                        fish do not resemble digits.  It was just a fish.  Pictured to the right,
                                        evolutionists suggest that it was the first fish to come out of the water and
               walk on land.  The huge problem is that it used gills for breathing.  Its legs and lungs had to evolve
               simultaneously.  No chance!

               What about Human Fossils?
               So have paleontologists been able to unearth ancient fossils that would form a link between the apes
               and modern man?  Most fossils of men remain essentially the same as modern man and some are really
               a problem for the evolutionists.

               Homology

               Evolutions have other ways they seek to validate their theory.  One is
               an argument from homology, or  the similarity of structures.  For
               example, the bones of the forelimbs of a man, horse, bat, whale, and
               dog share certain superficial structural similarities.  These similar
               structures are supposed to indicate that their possessors all came
               from a common ancestor.  This is one of the most appealing
               arguments used by evolutionists because it appears to be supported
               by visually observable evidence that can be readily perceived.

               However, if similarities show evolutionary relationship, then dissimilarities should conversely show a
               lack of relationship.  The rule must be consistently applied and not simply ignored, as evolutionists do,
               when the evidence conflicts with it.  For example, the following structures are very similar to those in
               humans:  the octopus eye, pig heart, Pekingese dog’s face, milk of the donkey, and the pronator
               quadratus muscle of the Japanese salamander.  When considering red blook cells, man is more similar to
               frogs, fish, and birds than to sheep.  These homologies do not indicate close evolutionary relationships.
               The evolutionary tree of life separates widely the octopus and man!
                                                                            13









               12  https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17173-why-ida-fossil-is-not-the-missing-link/
               13  Luther D. Sunderland, Darwin’s Enigma, p. 123.
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23