Page 90 - Advanced Biblical Backgrounds Student Textbook
P. 90

The burning of the central temple was a declaration of unconditional victory.  Often it was the location
               of the last stand of resistance. Only if the gods of the city had abandoned that city to its fate would they
               allow their own home to be destroyed.  When Sennacherib destroyed Babylon and the temple of
               Marduk in 689 B.C., he claimed to have done so on behalf of Marduk, who wished to punish his people
               for their evil behavior.

               The captors were understood to have free rein with the city and its populace.  The defeated city had no
               gods to whom they might appeal for mercy and no hope for a change in their fate.  Their gods were
               believed to have moved to the capital of the victors, where they became patrons of the kings of that
               city.

               The Book of Lamentations says the same thing about Nebuchadnezzar II burning Jerusalem and it’s
               temple in 586 B.C. (2 Kings 25:9).  Yahweh Himself had become Judah’s enemy (Lam. 2:5) and destroyed
               His own temple – His “tabernacle” and “place of assembly” (2:6).  With Yahweh’s permission, Judah’s
               enemy now “made a noise in the house of the Lord.” (2:7).

                                                                                     nd
               Later in history, we will see Titus attack Jerusalem in 70 A.D. and destroy the 2  temple located in the
               City of David.  Jesus predicted this destruction in Matthew 24:2, claiming that “not one stone will be left
               on another; everyone will be thrown down.”

                                       rd
               According to Eusebius, a 3  century historian, said, “The hill called Zion and Jerusalem, the building
               there, that is to say, the temple, has been utterly removed or shaken.”  This means completely destroyed
               or utterly gone.  As Christ prophesized, “Not one stone shall be left upon another that shall not be
               thrown down.”

               Josephus (who was alive at the time of the destruction of the temple) said, “It was so thoroughly laid
               even with the ground by those that dug it up to the foundation, that there was left nothing to make
               those that came thither believe it had ever been inhabited.”  Eleazer Ben Jair, the commander at
               Masada, wrote “It (Jerusalem) is now demolished to the very foundations, and hath nothing left but that
               monument of it preserved, I mean the camps of those Romans that hath destroyed it, which still dwells
               upon its ruins.”

                                                      nd
               Josephus described the destruction of the 2  Temple.  He described how the Roman soldiers tore up the
               foundation stones after the temple was burned to obtain the melted gold that had seeped between the
               cracks on the floor.  After the Romans burned the city and destroyed the temple, Jesus Christ’s
               prediction of utter destruction was confirmed by Josephus.  Not one stone was left on another.

               Today you can go to the “temple mount” in Jerusalem.  The Jews worship at the western wall where
               they claim that it was the only wall left of the original temple.  The large foundation stones have been
               dated back to the time of the original temple.  Perhaps, those stone are not really the ancient temple.
               Either Jesus Christ’s prediction and all the witnesses of the events are incorrect, or the western wall is
               NOT the site of the ancient temple in Jerusalem.








                                                             89
   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95