Page 163 - ENTREPRENEURSHIP Innovation and entrepreneurship
P. 163

53231_Innovation and Entrepreneurship.qxd  11/8/2002  10:50 AM  Page 156




              156              THE PRACTICE OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP

              lists the areas in which performance has fallen below budget, in which
              there is a “shortfall,” in which there is a “problem.” At the monthly
              management  meeting,  everyone  then  goes  to  work  on  the  so-called
              problems. By the time the meeting adjourns for lunch, the whole morn-
              ing has been taken up with the discussion of those problems.
                 Of course, problems have to be paid attention to, taken seriously, and
              tackled. But if they are the only thing that is being discussed, opportu-
              nities will die of neglect. In businesses that want to create receptivity to
              entrepreneurship, special care is therefore taken that the opportunities
              are also attended to (cf. Chapter 3 on the unexpected success).
                 In these companies, the operating report has two “first pages”:
              the traditional one lists the problems; the other one lists all the
              areas in which performance is better than expected, budgeted, or
              planned for. For, as was stressed earlier, the unexpected success in
              one’s own business is an important symptom of innovative oppor-
              tunity. If it is not seen as such, the business is altogether unlikely
              to  be  entrepreneurial.  In  fact  the  business  and  its  managers,  in
              focusing  on  the  “problems,”  are  likely  to  brush  aside  the  unex-
              pected success as an intrusion on their time and attention. They
              will say, “Why should we do anything about it? It’s going well
              without  our  messing  around  with  it.”  But  this  only  creates  an
              opening for the competitor who is a little more alert and a little
              less arrogant.
                 Typically,  in  companies  that  are  managed  for  entrepreneurship,
              there are therefore two meetings on operating results: one to focus on
              the problems and one to focus on the opportunities.
                 One  medium-sized  supplier  of  health-care  products  to  physi-
              cians and hospitals, a company that has gained leadership in a num-
              ber of new and promising fields, holds an “operations meeting” the
              second  and  the  last  Monday  of  each  month. The  first  meeting  is
              devoted  to  problems—to  all  the  things  which,  in  the  last  month,
              have done less well than expected or are still doing less well than
              expected six months later. This meeting does not differ one whit
              from any other operating meeting. But the second meeting—the one
              on  the  last  Monday—discusses  the  areas  where  the  company  is
              doing better than expected: the sales of a given product that have
              grown faster than projected, or the orders for a new product that are
              coming  in  from  markets  for  which  it  was  not  designed.  The  top
              management of the company (which has grown ten-fold in twenty
              years) believes that its success is primarily the result of building
   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168