Page 19 - LWFC Catalog
P. 19

2PM -      Application of Lightweight Materials to the Support of Rail Systems Lightweight materials
         2:50 PM     have widespread use in the construction of lightweight embankments for roadway systems.
                     These  materials  are  desirable  due  to  their  low  mass,  which  reduces  settlement,  increases
                     bearing capacity, and improves slope stability.  Unfortunately, a widespread application has
                     not been achieved for rail systems, even though lightweight materials offer the same benefits.
                     The relatively limited use of lightweight railway embankment is due, in part, to the additional
                     design, construction, and operational considerations and requirements specific to rail systems.
                     For  example,  the  magnitude  of  dynamic  rail  deflection  developed  by  a  passing  train  atop
                     lightweight embankment is an important consideration for safe railway operations and long-
                     term  track  performance  and  maintenance.  We  will  address  this  and  other  issues  and  show
                     examples  of  lightweight  rail  embankment  performance  for  heavy,  commuter,  and  light  rail
                     systems worldwide.

          2PM -      Laboratory Tests  for  Characterizing  EPS Geofoam  EPS  Geofoam  have  been  tested
         2:50 PM     following different standards for compression, bending, tensile, shear, oedometer and direct
                     shear. Comparisons of results for two theoretical densisties, 20 and 40 kg/m3, are presented,
                     so the behaviour of the material according to this characterstic is understood. In addition, for
                     compression, flexion and tensile stress, results of EPS manufactured in Spain and Norway are also
                     studied.

          4PM -      Development of Permeability Testing for Permeable Low-Density Cellular Concrete Initial
         4:50 PM     testing for the hydraulic conductivity of Permeable Low Density Cellular Concrete (PLDCC) was
                     conducted via ASTM D5084 – “Standard Test Methods for Measurement of Hydraulic Conduc-
                     tivity of Saturated Porous Materials Using a Flexible Wall Permeameter”. In addition to the D5084
                     Test, ASTM C1701 – “Standard Test Method for Infiltration Rate of in Place Pervious Concrete”
                     was used. While ASTM C1701 is a somewhat effective means of measuring the infiltration rate
                     of water into in place PLDCC, it does not effectively measure permeability of fully saturated
                     PLDCC.  The  D5084  Test  was  a  logical
                     first  choice  for  testing  PLDCC  due  to
                     thewide use of the test in the industry
                     and  the  ability  to  easily  hold  a  sam-
                     ple  in  the  flexible  wall  permeameter.
                     D5084 is well suited for low permeability
                     soils such as clay. Due to the limitations
                     of the D5084 procedure as outlined in
                     the specification, this method proved
                     incapable of measuring higher perme-
                     abilities  encountered  in  PLDCC  and
                     yielded erroneous results. ASTM D2434 –
                     “Standard Test Method of Permeability
                     of Granular Soils (Constant Head)” was
                     selected as a potential alternative test
                     method to the  D5084  test.  The D2434
                     test is more applicable to high perm-
                     ability  materials  such  as  compacted
                     sands and gravels. Although the D2434
                     method is better suited to the typical
                     ranges  of  permeability  PLDCC,  test-
                     ing this unique material presented ad-
                     ditional  challenges.  Modifications  to
                     sample  fabrication  and  preparation
                     for testing were necessary due to the
                     nature of PLDCC.

                                     (continued on next page)
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24