Page 9 - APPENDIX_00_PREFIX 1-17

-9-
asked. This can be resolved and I can help but you need to do your bit as well. I am back next week and will look into the statement and see what can be done. Possibly a further statement agreeing that the other works done by yourself and others was up to a good standard in my view.
[PLEASE NOTE that “PBC” made no comment nor request for help of any kind in any com- munication which does indicate Mr White had been well versed in other accusations]
Regards, Tony
P.s I did thank you for the referral, re Eggerton. [worth £80,000 plus vat] (Folder_00 Item_33, 34)
(f) “PBC” replied in an email dated 15 June 2016 @ 22:10: OK, let me know when back and ready to meet - and bring copies of the two snagging lists I supposedly requested and when I supposedly said no, no money... and where did the reference to Nigel Brooks come from? (Folder_00 Item_35)
(g) “PBC” also reminded Mr White a copy (forwarded) of an email dated 8 September 2015 to Mr Leo White in accounts: Thank you for your email and Retention Invoice. Through no fault of AR Lawrence, we have been unable to finalise a few snagging items needing attention [from our one and only snagging list and completion statement and final costings from our Surveyor to both “PBC” and AR Lawrence] - hence, I will, if I may, await a convenient time to finally meet and sort which I re- gret will not be before mid/late October due to various reasons beyond my immediate control [the weather was appalling] - all will then be finalised and final payments made. In the meantime, please accept my aopologies. (Folder_00 Item_36, 37, 38, 39)
4_ accounting & reserves concerns.
(a) in a letter from “PBC” to “mH’s” Solicitor on 28 may 2016 he states: As I will amply explain to Mr. Belafonte [RBK&C], and prove beyond a shadow of doubt, the requested documentation (13 original invoices, 10 of which relate to the £105,877) is in perfect order, amounts to £105,877 and would have been supplied as we agreed to do in our unacknowledged letter of 1 April 2016 but our offer to comply was ignored, for very dubious reasons as documented, but as you had made multi- ple slurs and accusations, again totally unsubstantiated and all totally disproved as you well know, in your initial 13pp letter of 23 March 2016, all of which required our immediate reply, along with ir- refutable proof to deny the malicious untruths of your client’s various and multiple accusations bor- dering, in our Solicitor’s opinion, on the libelous. We did, though, still offer to comply once we received our requests. (Folder_00 Item_40)
(b) in a letter from “PBC” to Steve Belafonte on 28 may 2016 he states: I can also prove cate- gorically whilst attending your office, that despite what you have been told in very unsubstantiated innuendo, that absolutely no lessee, including Mrs Hillgarth, made a formal nor indeed informal request to view any documentation from our YE2014 Service Charge Accounts (dated 30 May 2015) until Mrs Hillgarth’s email request on 17 December 2015
Mrs Hillgarth’s request was the only one received, and in fact the only one in the 5 years we have been managing our little block of 9 flats at Mitre House, SW3. Any reference to others is 100% unsubstantiated. (Folder_00 Item_41)
(c) in a letter from “PBC” to Steve Belafonte on 8 June 2016 he states: I attach a copy of the 2014 accounts dated 30 May 2015, Mrs Hillgarth’s email request dated 17 December, a copy of our Quarterly Demands statutory details and I have with me the various requested documents. (Folder_00 Item_42)
(d) in a letter from “PBC” to “mH’s” Solicitor on 25 may 2016 he states:
17_as is well documented on this 22 June 2014 s.20, available funds amounted to £98,262 approxi- mately with a requirement to fund a £105,019 works programme agreed by Mrs Hillgarth etc