27_PBC to Begg_31-5-16 + ADDENDUM_B (2pp)

MITRE HOUSE MANAGEMENT LIMITED (REPRESENTING THE NINE LEASEHOLD OWNERS OF MITRE HOUSE)
CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERIES & CONCIERGE ADDRESS
ON-SITE 24/7 BUREAU: SUITE 7 MITRE HOUSE • 124 KINGS ROAD • LONDON SW3 4TP EMERGENCY 24/7 TELEPHONE +44 20 7589 7502 • MBL: +44 (0)798 33 33 543
KNIGHTSBRIDGE BUREAU: 7 EGERTON GARDENS • LONDON SW3 2BP • MBL: +44 (0)798 33 33 543
COUNTRY BUREAU: BUCKLAND NEWTON PLACE • BUCKLAND NEWTON • DORSET DT2 7BX • MBL: +44 (0)798 33 33 543 OVERSEAS BUREAU: 290 HILL CREST GREEN 2 • BOWALAWATTA • KANDY • SRI LANKA • GPS: +94 (77) 9757355
EMAIL: MANAGEMENT@MITREHOUSE.COM • WWW.MITREHOUSE.COM
ADDENDUM_B
In your 13pp 23 March 2016 letter you wrote:
31 May 2016
If you still decline, following several requests, to provide this information, or to offer any plausible explanation, Mrs Hillgarth is perfectly entitled to draw the insinuations to which you object so strenuously in your threatening e-mail note of 23 March 2015. You have a duty as a director of MHML, the head lessor managing (or purporting to man- age) Mitre House, to supply this information to your lessees. If you fail to do so we are entitled to assume that there has been misfeasance and will report the matter to the relevant authorities for investigation.
Our comment: there no several requests - there was one from Mrs Hillgarth on 17 December 2015
Our comment: you will note in our email reply to Mrs Hillgarth to her request of the 17 December, we state:
“These requests are well out of time coming as they do after the 6 months since the accounts were published” copy email attached 17 December 2015 @ 13.23h.
This reply also has the clause in Mrs Hillgarth’s lease stating the statutory period etc
As such, I find it very difficult to understand your comment in your letter dated 11 May 2016 that:
“And now you appear to be seeking legal advice to avoid producing them at all. I think this volte-face deserves explanation.” (“I apologise for not being able to identify page nor paragraph as your correspondence does not have the luxury of page numbers?”) - you go on to state: “Whether or not this latest ploy will buy you a temporary respite from the obligation to produce the invoices is a matter for RBKC and Mr Belafonte.”
Under the circumstances of our comment in our reply to Mrs Hillgarth of 17 December 2015 @13.23h I cannot see how you can state “you appear to be seeking legal advice to avoid producing them” or indeed “this latest ploy”
A latest ploy first stated on 17 December 2016 and you having made this email relevant since day one and having perused her voluminous correspondence - not voluminously enough I would propose.
As I’ve oft now requested, is 17 December 2015 inside or outside the statutory 6 month period for our YE2014 accounts dated 30 May 2015? If yes, we are correct and it’s no ploy, nor hiding anything, for if we had anything to hide we’d hardly have offered to comply in our unacknowledged letter of 1 April 2016. If it’s no, then we must comply to keep within the law. We await your response to our now multiple requests.
MAINTAINING MITRE HOUSE
DIRECTORS • PAUL BROWN-CONSTABLE • SEGAR KARUPIAH • DIMA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
REG. OFFICE • 9 ACTON HILL MEWS • UXBRIDGE ROAD • LONDON W3 9QN • REGISTERED NO. 7731341 • ENGLAND
Inspection of Invoices
Under Section 22 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 Mrs Hillgarth has the right to inspect accounts, receipts, and other documents supporting the accounts summary, and you are obliged to afford her reasonable facilities to do so, including the ability to take copies or extracts. Since you have consistently denied her this information she has asked me to undertake this on her behalf. In summary I am now asking you to take the following actions:
a registered member of since 1 October 2014