Page 595 - NEW FINAL 616 BIG BAD BEGG

-19-
in THe WesT London CoUnTY CoUrT - Case No: [ ]
Mrs MiCHeLe HiLLGArTH - Claimant
versus
MiTre HoUse MAnAGeMenT LiMiTed - First Defendant and
pAUL BroWn-ConsTABLe - Second Defendant
and
seGAr KArUpiAH - Third Defendant
and
JAMiL rAJA - Fourth Defendant __________________________________________________________________________________
(a) compensation and/or reimbursement founded on statute,
and damages based on fraudulent misrepresentation, as itemised
in Section (a) above, in the amount of
(b) damages for breach and/or repudiation of contract by the Defendants as referred to in Section (B) above, in the amount of: (c) damages for conversion and based on the Defendants’ breach
11,514 8,794 3,500
of statutory duty as referred to in Section (C) above, in the amount of: (d) damages in tort for deceit, to be assessed as referred to in
Section (D) above:
TBa
(e) interest at the rate of 8% on the sums referred to in paragraphs (a), (b),(c) and (d) above from the date of issue of this Claim until judgment
pArTiCULArs oF CLAiM
__________________________________________________________________________________
or sooner payment, pursuant to Section 69 of the County Courts act 1984.
TBa
ToTAL
25,000
all to be awarded against the Second Third and Fourth Defendants in their personal capacities and in such proportions as the Court may determine.
33. The value of this action exceeds £5,000, but does not exceed £25,000.
i believe and the Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true and i am duly authorized by the Claimant to sign this statement.
A Considered response: i Consider THe ABove sTATeMenT To Be disHonesT And LiBeLLoUs Given THe evidenCe sUppLied To dATe WHiCH inConTroverTiBLY dis- proves ALL ACCUsATions And innUendos
.
statement of Truth
...................................................... P.F.C.Begg
Solicitor
...and don’t forget?
Mrs Hillgarth wrote in an email sent to all lessees on 21 August 2014:
PleaSe reFer To aTTaCheD “AddendA/FUrTHer reFerenCes” iN SuPPorT oF argumeNT