Page 596 - NEW FINAL 616 BIG BAD BEGG

-20-
in THe WesT London?CoUnTY CoUrT - Case No: [ ]
Mrs MiCHeLe HiLLGArTH - Claimant
versus
MiTre HoUse MAnAGeMenT LiMiTed - First Defendant and
pAUL BroWn-ConsTABLe - Second Defendant
and
seGAr KArUpiAH - Third Defendant
and
JAMiL rAJA - Fourth Defendant __________________________________________________________________________________
pArTiCULArs oF CLAiM
__________________________________________________________________________________
“We have all invested enough time on this refurbishment and there is no reason for you to decide to change the choice made by the majority on the lighting.
The lighting is not going to be the 1st thing change during the refurbishment so please make sure you do not purchase anything without the approval of the majority. We do not want your cheap lighting . Please stick to what has been agreed. Otherwise you will be liable for the cost. I am again speaking on behalf of the majority . If anyone disagreed you will know.
So in brief no lighting and no painting until the lessees are satisfied . From the majority at Mitre House .
Michele Hillgarth
I suggest you ask Mrs Hillgarth one very simple question...
How were MHML and you as a Director planning to fund the lighting that you refer to in your email of 21 August 2014 to Paul and copied to all lessees?
PleaSe reFer To aTTaCheD “AddendA/FUrTHer reFerenCes” iN SuPPorT oF argumeNT