Page 7 - NEW FINAL 616 BIG BAD BEGG

21) Email dated 19 October 2012 - alleged majority?
22abcdef) Accounts - check accounts - multiple
23) Email dated 20 November 2018 to all lessees - the truth to check?
24) Email dated 1 April 2015 - from Mrs Hillgarth - cheap, vulgar and unsuitable?
25) oh really? how was the lift refurb, emergency lighting and new electrics funded?
26) D-Day 8 June 2014 full analysis of Mrs Hillgarth’s contrarinesss 2011-2014
27) D-Day 20 June 2014 email end of the affair re: Mrs Hillgarth’s contrarinesss 2011-2014 28) Letter to all lessees dated 7 June 2017 - MHML have had enough...!
29) Email from PFC Begg 13 June 2017 denying Audio authenticity etc no music etc 30abc) Emails proving Mrs Hillgarth further contrarinesss
Not forgetting our invoice for time and costs in fielding her RTM fiasco which she ignored as usual.
-6-
If there was any doubt concerning the veracity of above items, please advise and I will send fur- ther examples of each and any listed - the above items are simply examples of multiples on file. Also attached for ease of referencing is your letter of 23 March 2016 with my comments attached refuting all accusations and innuendos which you’ll no doubt notice have not changed from those given in subsequent correspondence when you simply repeat the same accusations & innuen- dos.
Also attached along with many other relevant documentation at the end of this entire tôme is your client’s Witness Statement, again my with comments attached, which never saw the light of day thankfully for her as it sounds as though it was written by “The Mad Woman of Chaillot” which my responses to each of her observations evidence - leaving aside her classic admittance in para 73 that neither she nor any other lessee requested nor indeed were denied or ignored ac- cess to view YE2014 Accounts’ paperwork? And six pages (yes six) re: keys & police atten- dance?
Would seem your 23 March 2016 was based on lies and malicious innuendos?
Other references attached simply further evidence your client’s memory loss, dishonesty and malevolence directed at both MHML and myself in pursuit of her obvious vendetta to discredit MHML due to our insistence she comply with her lease covenants, desist in signing off tenancy agreements maintaining that all consents had been granted and requiring her resignation as a Director of MHML subsequent to her progressing an RTM application to remove MHML to run Mitre House herself?
If ever further proof be needed of your client’s contrarinesss I suggest you ask of her; “As a Di- rector of MHML in 2014, how were you expecting the new lighting and electrics to be funded?” And subsequent to her recent visit to Mitre House on 17th April 2019 with her attendant person- nel when Emergency Lighting was briefly mentioned you can add; “As a Director of MHML in 2014, how were you expecting the Emergency lighting to be funded?”
Answers to those two queries will be both educational and very illuminating. Might even be yet another game, set and match - in fact indisputably so. Unless of course I purloined £29,000 odd from lessees?
In other words all your accusations, innuendos, financial forensics and insinuations are an- swered and are all as ever denied as spiteful rubbish as all evidence supplied to date, audio or no audio, establishes without doubt. You client lied to you since day one, as your 23 March 2016 letter amplifies!
If further proof were needed since her £35,000 efforts to libel myself and MHML to no avail she can only reflect on what has happened subsequently to the First Tier Tribunal on 26 June 2017
a) explaining to her three lessee cohorts why she wasted each of their £2352 contributions when MHML had offered to step aside and donate the Head Lease for zero well prior to 26 June 2017?