Page 8 - NEW FINAL 616 BIG BAD BEGG

d) despite her legacy 2014 disapproval, lessees including her alleged virtual majority, voted in favour of doing the next major works concurrently to save money and disruption?
-7-
b) explaining to her three lessee cohorts and indeed all other lessees why their annual outgoings have risen 333% (from £3000 to £10,000pa) within 12 months due to her stupidity in having a Man- ager/Agents appointed when MHML had offered to step aside and donate the Head Lease for zero well prior to 26 June 2017? We had to as UK law was requiring specific qualifications over common sense!
c) she was finally, as predicted, required to comply with her lease covenant to request permission to sublet - just one or two other covenants still to be assessed?
e) despite her legacy 2014 disapproval, lessees including her alleged virtual majority, made no ob- jection to our First Tier Management quoting works’ costs including vat and fees?
f) despite her legacy 2014 disapproval, and indeed her subsequent insistence of removal from cer- tain floors at Mitre House, lessees including her alleged virtual majority and indeed the various sub- let tenants, voted in favour of having artworks, artifacts and topiary?
But alas, all (save for 3rd floor) had been removed, discarded and dumped in a skip never to see the light of day again resulting in, as one tenant made clear, “it’s like coming back to a morgue!”
And if further proof of her vindictive cultural vandalism were needed, I suggest you plough deeper into this tôme or better still check out the www.mitrehouse.com for examples of spiting one’s nose to spite one’s face and all made worse as she doesn’t even live here.... thank God...!
She hasn’t won a round yet but spent a small fortune attempting to... exactly as MHML restricted her from doing whilst a Director and why she was required to resign for disloyalty & stupidity.
Our www.mitrehouse.com has since 2012 had ALL Accounts/Budgets published online which does beg the question that it’s a strange thing to do if any shenanigans/purloining were in evidence for any lessee or anybody else to view, and reminded to view, not once but on mutiple occasions, including Mrs H’s husband, Mr. T who trained initially as a Chartered Accountant.
Bet you a slap up lunch he recognises her voice on the audio as I betcha, do her two children?
If you do not wish to peruse the multiple following attachments (evidence) proceed to the COVER PAGE (Page 135 via Acrobat not pagination) and enjoy further correspondence references in the body of the subsequent pages which contain important relevant documentation which to date you appear totally oblivious to their content which, despite having been supplied on previous occasions, contain ALL the evidence needed to disprove ALL your petty and ad nauseam vapid, pathetic observations/accusations/innuendos and prove your client to be a congenital liar (audio?) or mem- ory challenged - let’s just hope she’s still wealthy enough to finance your paltry efforts on her behalf and you healthy enough to enjoy the proceeds?
You’ll need to be as this reply is 616pp (plus +++ most likely after recent events (your client just fired her Agents on 9th June 2019) so I suggest you use the flipbook link in the email or if a masochist plough through the pdf if your machine has the capacity to cope with it?
Yours sincerely,
Paul Brown-Constable
PS I’m still waiting for that Polygraph Test - is your client agreeable?