Page 2 - 50_PBC to Segar_15-7-16 (2pp)

f) the fact that lessees were not satisfactorily advised that £31,756 was paid to MHML for works done outside of the Surveyor’s Schedule of Works
No big deal - anybody could have requested info etc as above
g) the fact that MHML maintain that Mrs Hillgarth did expect certain workings which she considered to be included in the Schedule of Works and were costed in by AR Lawrence for them to perform
True she did and it’s been proved conclusively
h) the fact that it now appears that Mrs Hillgarth did not request or expect any workings to be done outside of the Schedule of Works
This is what I’ve been up against - pack of lies - totally disproved
2
i) the fact that it now appears that MHML stated in correspondence that Mrs Hillgarth was insisting that certain items within the Schedule of Works should be excluded in order that other improvements outside of the Schedule of Works could be included
This is what I’ve been up against - pack of lies - totally disproved, total rubbish (in fact he’s simply got it wrong) j) the fact that MHML illegally debited a debt due from Mrs Hillgarth to MHML for an outstanding RTM costs invoice in
lieu of a payment made to all Directors for a 25% share of lease extension monies received.
Tricky - no idea legal or not - you were happy with how we did it? He calls it a Dividend and I’ve made clear no Dividends paid only on invoice.....
k) the fact that MHML were illegally charging fees for time and costs in managing Mitre House since 2012
This is nitpicking rubbish - only worry being as I always told you, we should really have an s.20 but we get around that by an annually restored budget approval - only argument could be over the fee charged but it’s no problemo...
l) the fact that MHML (Paul Brown-Constable) organised, arranged and managed additional workings outside of the Schedule of Works using funds saved from the agreed s.20 budget of £105,019 without first gaining permission from the other leaseholders.
That’s my problem but in truth it’s again nit-picking, but I’ll deal with it and have done
m) the fact that Paul Brown-Constable physically performed many workings outside of the Schedule of Works, whilst remaining within the agreed budget (plus £858 overspend) without the approval of other leaseholders.
That’s my problem but in truth it’s again nit-picking, but I’ll deal with it and have done
n) the fact that despite a request from Mrs Hillgarth on 17 December 2015 to view invoices from the 2014 Accounts dated 30 May 2015, Paul Brown-Constable refused her request stating the statutory 6 month limit for access.
She was answered - told to wait until after Xmas - told her also she was 17 days late...never heard another word until Begg’s 23 March 2016 - told him too, but remember we offered to bike over but never replied to.
o) the fact that allegedly other lessees also made requests for information which was not supplied (Mr Leigh- Pemberton since May 2015 and Mr Fortunati on 17 and 21 December 2015)
Pack of lies and I’ve proved that...no body did except for her on 17 December 2015
p) the fact that we plagiarized the Canonbury website for our own benefit to wilfully promote ourselves.
Admitted, aplogised for, apologies accepted and the few offending pieces (not our website) removed. As pre- viously pointed out, this type of behaviour, admittedly very incorrect, is endemic throughout the world and can hardly be construed as you are implying, a hanging offence. Were it so, Canonbury would not have accepted our apology with such grace. I still consider your client’s observation to be indicative of her spite- fulness.
q) the fact that unless you receive comment or contact from Mr Karupiah or Mr Raja or Mr Solomon by 6pm on Friday 15th July you will send your draft notice to the Fraud Squad. I am presuming that my comment is insufficient?
This is where you come in...... what this Begg is wanting is an assurance that you and Jamil are as disgusted and dis- turbed as I am over her lies and innuendos and are quite content with Mr Brown-Constable’s ample and comprehen- sive replies to all accusations levied at himself and MHML’s Directors - in fact read the below: