Page 32 - 53_PBC to Begg (Crime OCR)_12-7-16 (33pp)

32
My email to Mr & Mrs Fortunati (Flat 9) on 18 October 2014:
As regards colours etc, I again attach what I thought was your preferred decor, with both black lift doors and the damaged copper/bronze doors, which shows rough examples of your chosen Taupe with your preferred white ceiling and white dado rail and lovely white plastic Burlap lights. I appreciate your other two references of Dulux Potters Clay 2 and 4 and Dulux Rich Praline 5 and 6 are now included but would welcome to which of the two attached decor references should they be applied - the black lift or copper/bronze lift?
I look forward to your answer, including where exactly in the schedule of works is included the lift painting within the £105,019 budget. Please advise.
If these email correspondences above don’t convince you that lessees knew/wanted/ex- pected additional works, let alone the other references throughout this reply (Surveyor’s Fees etc), then nothing will.
I fully appreciate that your stated focus of interest is (recently, if I’m to believe your three phone messages) only the demanded “works 2014” invoices (originals not copies) but seeing as your client made her request outside of the 6 month statutory period and also added insult to injury by making scurrilous and totally untrue accusations all of which you have repeated yet again in your Crime Report (on which I am making my replies and re- sponses) despite previous correspondence from me with fully supporting comprehensive denials, I am yet again required on behalf of MHML to robustly make clear yet again com- prehensive responses to all your points made in this report, and again with fully support- ing documentation.
I am aware that I am now required to make the almost very same responses and replies to your most recent communication, namely your formal notice pursuant to Section 22 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 in advance of your application for an Order under Section 24 of the Act and for recovery of monies due to Mrs Hillgarth and other leaseholders.
Your Notice bundle consists of a two page covering letter, an 18pp Preliminary Notice, 14pp of itemised documents, with one running to 53pp and the others averaging 5pp each, and a 20pp Witness Statement from Mrs Hillgarth - dated I might add some two weeks after your refusal to oblige my request to have sight of it? Obviously, as it didn’t exist when you refused my request (28th July) following your notification it was in existence? And I note the editing and required re-issuing of Mr. White’s original Witness Statement - neverthe- less, both Mrs Hillgarth’s and Mr White’s (revised) Statements still contain untruths.
More time, more costs, but I’ll attend to it as promptly as possible.
Yours sincerely,
Paul Brown-Constable
cc Segar Karupiah, Dima International
encl. various (A) - (F)
and most especially (12, D & DD) initially attached to 1 August 2016 letter.