Page 7 - 74_PBC to Begg_13-12-16 (22pp)

Management have produced same for £648 TO ALSO INCLUDE BOXING IN THE LOOSE WIRING). This initial saving of £1177.56 will not however be reimbursed to lessees at the end of the works, as Management will utilise this first of many savings, to progress works on the interior NOT included in the Surveyor's Specifications (such as the lift workings).
In brief, Management are attempting, and will succeed, in presenting the interior decor of Mitre House to a standard not even envisaged by most lessees, at no additional cost to lessees over and above the agreed £105,019 budget. This will be achieved by making small savings where possible, common sense, hard work and a great deal of thought.
The only proviso to that statement is so long as no EXTERIOR WORKINGS (over which Management has little or no control) require additional contingency monies which is, of course, why all lessees re- ceived the September Quarterly Demands with the additional non-voluntary contribution of £2000 each, so enabling reserves to amply fund any additional expenditures.
To date, Management nor the Comments Book have received any adverse nor complimentary com- ments. Long may that continue.
Management would finally request that Flat 9 and now Flat 5 address their impertinent and totally irrele- vant comments and queries to other lessees as opposed to Management, who have made clear in their reply emails to date, including this one, that no further comments nor queries of an impertinent nature be further directed to Management.
We are far too busy saving lessees (of which all four Management Directors also are) money, time and disruption whilst these works progress.
And I've just wasted a valuable half hour putting this reply together instead of getting on with making Mitre House look beautiful by installing the rear scaffolding on my own....not easy, fancy coming over?
Don't you ever give up, Michele - firstly I'm accused of getting my flat done cheaply by A.R.Lawrence and now that I'm doing all the works. You must think me very stupid!
Paul
PS Don't let me down on my next bet that both you and Susanna will visit before the week-end.... to collect your key and mail no doubt.
And again I sent this email dated 11 September 2014 @16.30 to Mrs Hillgarth:
Dear Michele -
Somewhat amused to now have to field yet more comments from Flat 3, following Flat 9 and your own ignorant comments. Why do you persist in causing bad feelings, misleading lessees like you did with the RTM affair and stirring up yet more disputes. Who's next to get in touch, Flats 1 and 8 one sup- poses as no doubt you've also attempted to poison their tranquility.
Our Surveyor hopefully made clear exactly what I advised him to explain if contacted by you, and ex- actly as I had explained to you (to little avail), namely that certain works are NOT and never were in- cluded the works specifications, such as lighting/electrics but are within the overall budget of £105,019. How many times do you have to told?
Having spent half an hour with me on Tuesday complaining of wiring in places and advised by me yet again that the specs included removing redundant wiring where found, you still berated our surveyor on the same observations for the very same information. Are you deaf or just contrary? You also agreed to the installation of a communal TV Aerial which would also clean up all redundant tv & satellite on roof (your first visit in 40 years....) including your three cables which had absolutely nothing attached - just redundant cables and something you had no idea of.
Bizarrely, he also advised that you requested yet another copy of the works specifications - what are you doing with the four or five you've already received? Selling them?
I have now instructed our surveyor and A.R. Lawrence personnel to refer any contact from you direct to me and to not discuss any matter or supply any information nor documentation to which you have no right until such time as the works are completed.