Page 24 - The Big Begg_1

-24-
“HOW DID YOU THINK MHML WERE FUNDING THE NEW LIGHTING?”
NOT wish to pay additional funds under any circumstances - their right, I'm afraid. I am still awaiting a reply from Jamil who is not back in UK until this w/end.
Might I suggest you also deal with Flats 1, 3, 4, 8 & most especially Flat 9 (who have made comment previously about NOT having to accept the cheapest quote etc - they are correct, it's a risk, but all Agent's are obliged to accept it or give good reason not to. Our reason is simply money!).
It would be appreciated, so long as you believe it, that they all be told that you are now totally satisfied subsequent to Friday's meeting, with all Management's competence,
professionalism, arrangements, specifications and quotes to date. You are not expected to approve the www.mitrehouse.org, as I'll leave that to filter through from
outside sources in due course, as indeed will comment on the interior of Mitre House - mark my words.
In an email reply from Mrs Hillgarth on 28 May
I suggest that you send the email as you have been dealing with that specific job .But I suggest you require the normal service charge and £ 1000 for the reserve and the same in September . In addition you should give a brief reason for doing so with figures
Followed by another email from Mrs Hillgarth on 28 May
Dear Paul ,
Since you have been dealing with this issue ,you must be the one sending section 20-3 ex- plaining why the company has been chosen and your intention to send the next service charge with the extra.
To which I replied by return:
As regards me sending out, are you quite sure it wouldn't raise yet more questions from your virtual majority? Sans doute, they will immediately email/contact you for clarifica- tion..... ? But if it comes from you direct, no contest, you can simply answer their queries/complaints/reasons/ etc
I submit that these responses indicate Mrs Hillgarth’s obstinacy and dis- loyalty to her fellow Directors in carrying out agreed responsibilities and our good reason to eventually insists she resigns her directorship.
So please no more wittering on about leaseholders rights of this, that and the other, including your constant references to MHML not advising them of what we as Landlord can do without any reference to them whatsoever in our capacity as Landlord, project managing any aspect at Mitre House including major and minor works so long as correct procedures are followed which you’ll have trouble disproving any procedures were not followed (see above notifications to lessees) from our issued s.20 Notices, including one in preparation for the Water Tank fiasco application to First Tier if needed (it wasn’t) - what you will note is your client refusing to oblige agreements to assist due to typically obstinate and combative reasons as the few examples below well evidence:
1_The Minutes of the 23 May 2014 Board Meeting state:
MH (Mrs Hillgarth) to write to all tenants that the Board of MHML (of which she was a Director) has carried [out] a proper and professional review of the tendering process and MHML will formally write to all tenants announcing the contractor (A&R Lawrence) to carry out the works.
Please note no “exclusively”, “only”, “solely” as your many PLEaSE rEFEr to attaCHED “ADDENDA/FURTHER REFERENCES” in SuPPort oF arguMEnt