Page 41 - C:\Users\Evans Moetji\Desktop\DPSA Guideline Digital Flipbook\
P. 41

GENERIC STEP-BY-STEP APPROACH   STEP TWO




                             Accurate spatial information is essential for conducting

                                                                               accessibility studies

               You should quality control all your spatial datasets before undertaking the accessibility study.    The aim
               is ultimately to identify spatial features and attributes that are incorrect so that they can be corrected
               where possible.    The quality control also provides an understanding of the level of accuracy associated
               with datasets that will be used in the accessibility studies.    When errors in the data cannot be corrected,
               the quality control exercise will indicate the levels of inaccuracy that may be associated with the results  of
               the accessibility study.

               The quality control exercise should follow standardised approaches that are internationally accepted and
               it needs to include aspects such as completeness, validity, logical consistency, physical consistency,
               referential integrity and positional accuracy.  For a detailed description of the methods that you can use
               to do quality control refer to Annexure 1 of this Guideline.

                               The South African Spatial Data Infrastructure provides

                                           policies and standards for spatial information

               The South African Spatial Data Infrastructure (SASDI) provides policies and standards for spatial
               information which are applicable to all public sector organisations.    Ideally your department should
               have policies on the capture and maintenance of spatial information, the use of data standards and
               the management of data, which are aligned to SASDI.

               Furthermore, national standards of the South African Bureau of Standards and international
               ISO  standards on geographic information, especially ISO 19111 on spatial referencing, ISO 19114 on
               quality  evaluation procedures and ISO 19115 on metadata provide guidance on the collection of the
               spatial information and its metadata.

               The South African Statistical Quality Assessment Framework which has been developed by
               StatsSA provides the framework for the quality improvement of all official statistics produced by organs
               of state.

               Figure 15 provides a template in which you can capture the results of the quality control exercise.
               The percentage column indicates how accurate (high percentages) or inaccurate (low percentages)
               particular factors associated with the datasets are.  The factors with low percentages should be focused
               on in improving the quality of the data.  Where errors in the data cannot be corrected, the inaccurate
               percentages should be noted.























                                                                                                                     36
                                                                                                                    36
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46