Page 35 - DAAT-HAIM-2
P. 35

Rabbi Chaim Walkin

                                 Sefer Da’at Chaim

                                                33rd ma’amar

         (i.e., from HaKadosh Baruch Hu) in his saying – “I do not want any
         part of Abraham or his G-d.” One must understand – wasn’t the
         dispute between the shepherds of Abraham and the shepherds of Lot a
         sufficiently compelling reason for Lot to depart from Abraham? – and
         when he did leave, why is his departure considered as being an act of
         rebellion against HaKadosh Baruch Hu and “a departure from the One
         Who Preceded the Universe?!”

         And so too here, it is appropriate to explain that although the departure
         of Lot from Abraham was not only because of the argument between
         his shepherds and the shepherds of Abraham, nevertheless, in reality
         hidden within the root of Lot’s departure was an underlying kernel
         which was the reason why Lot traveled to Sodom, as the pasuk states
         (in Beresheet 13:10) “Lot lifted up his eyes and saw before him
         the lush, verdant plain of the Jordan valley, as all of it was pasture-
         grazing land.” Lot’s love for money was the real reason from the
         very beginning that prompted Lot to depart from Abraham, yet if
         not for that love of money Lot would probably have been able to
         resolve the conflict between him and the shepherds of Abraham, and
         by his efforts he could have used all of his resources to remain in
         the presence of Abraham. The dispute between the shepherds of Lot
         and the shepherds of Abraham was only a pretense masking the true
         inner reason that brought Lot to separate himself from Abraham, and
         because of that inner reason, namely a passionate love of money, Lot’s
         leaving Abraham is characterized as “a departure from the One Who
         Preceded the Universe” and is in the category of a rebellion against
         HaKadosh Baruch Hu.

         With this insight we can explain another incident in the life of Lot. It
         is written (in Chumash Beresheet 19:33) “…and on that night she gave
         wine to their father to drink, and the older sister came onto her father
         and slept with him, and he was unaware of it when she layed with him
         and when she got up.” Rashi explains – the words “When the older
         sister got up” are emphasized by the Torah with dots above each letter,
         meaning, that when she got up Lot knew precisely what he did, and
         nevertheless he did not take any precautions the next night not to drink
         any wine and then lay with his second daughter. Rashi’s commentary
         is astounding! On what basis was Rashi able to explain that Lot knew

431
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40