Page 66 - 2005 DT 12 Issues
P. 66

Bird Brains                          when addressing each of its offspring.  tion expert at Ohio State University’s
                                                 In  another  study  conducted  at  Chimpanzee Center in Columbus first
              or  more  than  40  years,  re-  Brandeis University and detailed in  showed in 1989 that chimpanzees could
              searchers  have  explored  the  the July issue of the Journal of Com-  understand the idea of zero and use it
        Fcontroversial subject of animal  parative  Psychology,  comparative  when adding quantities of objects. She
        intelligence and communication. Am-  psychologist Irene Pepperberg discov-  argues that Alex’s “none” response may
        ple evidence is said to exist to attest that  ered that some birds may comprehend  just be a “default” response when he is
        humans are not the only “intelligent”  the mathematical concept of zero, an  unable to identify the number of objects
        species on earth, but the significance  abstract notion that human children  in front of him.
        of that evidence is often hard to inter-  rarely understand until around four   Pepperberg, currently an Adjunct
        pret in human terms. Two new studies  years of age.                       Professor at Brandeis University and
        suggest a level of complex thought and   According to National Geographic  an Associate Professor at MIT’s Media
        communication in birds far greater than  News Service, an African Grey Parrot  Lab, agrees that while Alex may indeed
        previously realized.                 (Psittacus Erithacus) named Alex has  understand the concept of zero, more
            One of those studies identifies at  been  one  of  Pepperberg’s  research  rigorous testing is needed to prove that
        least one species of parrot that seems  subjects in vocal learning for the last  African Grey parrots can be taught to
        to create  its own names for family  27 years. Alex has proven his ability  understand abstract numerical notions
        members and friends. Vocal labeling  to distinguish objects with different  in the same way as people do.
        indicates that the namer must be able  characteristics in a human language,    “[Alex’s ‘none’] isn’t the same
        to first visualize the individual or object  combining  qualities  such  as  color,  concept of zero that you and I have,”
        in  its  mind.  Specta-                                shape,  number  Pepperberg said. “That’s why I call it
        cled parrotlets (Forpus                                and size with an  a ‘zero-like’ concept. We are working
        conspicillatus), small,                                accuracy  aver-    to refine our knowledge of what this
        brightly green or blue                                  aging around 80  concept actually is.”
        colored South Ameri-                                    percent.  In  the    In the wild, African Grey parrots
        can parrots, use specific                                study, the bird was  would need a basic understanding of
        calls that “only refer                                  presented  with  more-versus-less  in  foraging,  Pep-
        to  the  individual  in                                 differently  col-  perberg said. Counting might come in
        question,”  said  Ralf                                  ored blocks in sets   handy when tracking the number of
        Wanker,  an  orni-                                      of two, three and   parrots in a flock and in deciphering
        thologist at Hamburg                                    six. When asked   vocalizations.
        University and lead author of the study.  which color group had five blocks, Alex   “That zero was represented in some
        “To my knowledge, it is the first time  answered “none.” Pepperberg then set   way by a parrot with a walnut-sized
                                                                                  brain . . . is striking.” Pepperberg said.
        that labeling or naming is described  up a series of tests in which the parrot   “Evolutionarily  the  connection  [of
        for animals in this way.” The findings  consistently identified zero quantities   birds] to humans is ancient . . . yet their
        are published in the July issue of the  of objects with the label “none.” The   brains seem to have homologues [struc-
        scientific journal, Animal Behavior.   bird had been previously taught the   tural similarities] to ours.”               c
            Wanker made audio recordings of  term “none” to indicate when neither
        17 individual birds from five different  of two identically sized objects was   July/August Board Notes
        families housed in a simulated environ-  larger that the other. He also used it to
        ment. Computer analysis of the sounds  indicate when there was no difference   July:
        confirmed that each bird’s initial con-  in other criteria, such as color or shape,   8   A motion was unanimously
        tact call was specific to each parrotlet  among a set of objects. Alex had never   carried to approve and fund a proposal
        and coincided with the individual’s  been taught to use “none” to indicate an   from the Great Basin Institute to hold a
        social standing. When a particular bird  absence of quantity without training or   week-long trails-building seminar in
        called its mate, it used a specific call.  prompting by humans.            October, 2005. The seminar would pro-
        It also used specific, yet similar, calls    Sally Boysen, an animal cogni-  vide good preliminary training for 8-10

        Page 2      FORRC/September  2005
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71