Page 28 - Aldi Lukman Nurhakim_How to Write Critical Esays: A Guide for Students of Literature
P. 28

Facing the question  27
             innately less worthy as topics for great drama than personal
             relationships? Then there are those Christian critics who have
             protested at the difficulty of staging Gloucester’s blinding.
             Could this be because they fear that the impact of eyeballs
             being torn out might make an audience reject the belief that
             physical suffering can do good so long as it leads to spiritual
             regeneration? But you may believe that a text contains for all
             time some unaltering value or meaning. Then you are bound to
             see the ideological pressures on criticism as hardly worth
             discussion. You will assume that the best critics are motivated
             only by a desire to see what has always been actually present in
             the text itself; the worst may be trying to press it into serving
             some non-literary cause, but they presumably do not deserve
             consideration.
               If, by contrast, you believe that the qualities and import of
             a text are constantly being redefined and that all criticism is
             bound to be creative production, then you will feel that to
             ‘account for’ those views of a text which have been ‘frequently
             expressed’ during some period of a text’s history is often
             crucial. You may even think that a major justification of
             literary study is that the history of critical interpretations can
             reveal how those with cultural influence have dominated in
             the past, and so alert you to some of the contemporary
             pressures under which you do the thinking and writing which
             are supposedly your own. Whether you think that your essay
             should discuss such topics must partly depend, of course, on
             how you interpret the terms of the set question since relevance
             to its demands is a major priority. But it is not the only one.
             Here, as so often, your decision as to whether certain issues
             should be tackled will also depend on your own theories about
             literature and criticism.


             Titles may tell you how much you need to read

             ‘Write an essay on King Lear’ clearly means that your priority is
             to answer the question: how attentively have you read  King
             Lear? Yet it may also pose the following questions about your
             reading: have you found any other works illuminating in
             assessing that play? did any other plays by Shakespeare or his
             contemporaries prove helpful as comparisons? did any literary
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33