Page 42 - TPA Journal May June 2024
P. 42

REASONABLE SUSPICION – detention.                    announcing that the officers are heading into a
                                                             “consensual encounter.” He got out of the
        After the trial court denied his motion to           vehicle and introduced himself to Appellant.
        suppress, Appellant Tairon Jose Monjaras pled        Meanwhile, Officer Starks exited the passenger
        guilty to unlawful possession of a firearm by a      side of the vehicle, walked around to the rear
        felon. He was sentenced to five years                of the cruiser, and stood a few feet away. Both
        imprisonment. On appeal, Appellant argued            officers were in uniform with their service
        that the trial court erred in denying his motion     pistols visible but holstered. The police car was
        to suppress because his interaction with law         parked in front of Appellant while the officers
        enforcement was an investigative detention           stood on either side of him.  There was an
        without reasonable suspicion rather than a           apartment building behind  Appellant. After
        consensual encounter. A majority of the court        introducing himself, Officer Sallee asked
        of appeals disagreed and found that the              Appellant for basic information including his
        interaction was a consensual encounter. We           name, where he lived, and if he had
        hold that  Appellant’s interaction with law          identification. Officer Sallee stood close to
        enforcement, which started as a consensual           Appellant, but his demeanor was relatively
        encounter, escalated into an investigative           friendly. Appellant appeared to understand the
        detention. We reverse the judgment of the court      questions and replied in broken English.
        of appeals and remand the case to that court to      Appellant told Officer Sallee that he lived in an
        determine whether the investigative detention        apartment across the street and had left his
        was supported by reasonable suspicion.               identification at home, but he offered to write
                                                             his name down. Officer Starks walked to the
        In December 2018, Officer J. Sallee and Officer      passenger side of the vehicle to retrieve a
        C. Starks were patrolling an area of                 fingerprinting device. While  Appellant was
        southwest Houston purportedly associated with        writing his name, Officer Sallee asked Appellant
        gang violence and narcotics trafficking. Around      if he had ever been arrested.  Appellant
        noon, Officers observed  Appellant walking           responded that he had previously been arrested
        around an apartment complex with a backpack          for “assault, ah, domestic violence.” Officer
        on.                                                  Sallee then asked Appellant “You nervous? You
                                                             look like you’re nervous.  You’re shaking.”
        The officers thought it was “not normal” that        Appellant seemingly confirmed that he was
        Appellant looked down as the officers drove by       nervous. Meanwhile, Officer Starks returned
        and looked up when they passed. The officers         and stood approximately two feet from
        also believed  Appellant—wearing a beanie,           Appellant. This placed Appellant within arm’s
        light jacket, and pants—was overdressed for the      length of each officer. Officer Sallee asked if
        weather.                                             Appellant had anything illegal on him,
                                                             including weapons. Appellant shook his head
        Officer Sallee wanted “to see where [Appellant]      “no,” and Officer Sallee asked if he could search
        was going or what was going on.”  The                Appellant. Appellant did not respond but began
        officers turned the car around but did not see       emptying his pockets. Apparently trying to stop
        Appellant. The officers assumed Appellant ran        Appellant, Officer Sallee quickly responded,
        away; however, they saw Appellant again on           “Hold on, hold on, hold on. May I search you?”
        the other side of the complex. The officers          While asking this, Officer Sallee placed his
        pulled in front of Appellant but did not turn        hand on Appellant’s arm. Appellant reached
        their police lights or siren on. Officer Starks can  into his pocket again while Officer Sallee put
        be heard on his body-worn camera recording           his hand around Appellant’s elbow and said,




        38                 www.texaspoliceassociation.com • (512) 458-3140             Texas Police Journal
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47