Page 32 - TPA Journal July-August 2025
P. 32

public entity; and (3) that such discrimination is   Donovan Bourrage was found guilty on two
        by reason of his disability.”  Key here is Hainze v.  counts, and Orlando Bourrage was found guilty on
        Richards, which foreclosed  ADA claims where         one count, of conspiracy to possess with the intent
        police officers face exigent circumstances.          to distribute methamphetamine.  Both defendants,
        As discussed above, there were indeed exigent cir-   who are cousins, appeal their convictions and their
        cumstances—Steve “was a suicide risk and had         sentences. Because Donovan and Orlando assert
        the      means       to      act     on      it.”    there was insufficient evidence to support their
          These exigent circumstances (circumstances         respective convictions, we recount the evidence
        resembling those in Hainze itself) foreclose ADA     “in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict.”
        relief.  Moreover,  Appellants cannot show that      Drug enforcement agents began investigating a
        Steve was discriminated against “by reason of his    suspected conspiracy to distribute methampheta-
        disability” (here, depression). Appellants point to  mine in Kemper County, Mississippi, and the east-
        no facts showing that Deputy Gallardo shot Steve     central Mississippi area in January 2020. Agent
        because Steve was depressed. Instead, they assert    James McCombs co-led the investigation with
        that  Young County lacked policies to “protect       another agent. The investigation began with con-
        [Steve’s] welfare” or “respond[] to threatened sui-  trolled purchases from Donovan in January 2020;
        cide calls with well-established crisis intervention  then, in May 2020, the court authorized a Title III
        techniques, including responding with a mental-      wiretap of suspected conspirators’ phones. During
        health professional.” But this doesn’t demonstrate   trial, the jury heard conversations between
        that Deputy Gallardo shot Steve “by reason of” his   Donovan, Orlando, and their alleged co-conspira-
        depression. Deputy Gallardo shot Steve “by rea-      tors, and Agent McCombs interpreted those con-
        son of” circumstances that would lead an objec-      versations as part of his testimony.
        tively reasonable officer to reasonably believe that  he evidence at trial reflected that on May 21, the
        Steve was reaching for or had a gun.                 Bourrage cousins discussed the prices they
                                                             charged for methamphetamine. Agent McCombs
        We AFFIRM the District Court in full for the rea-    interpreted Donovan’s statements as meaning that
        sons stated.                                         Donovan was paying a wholesale cost of $600 or
                                                             $700 per ounce of methamphetamine and selling it
        Winder v. Gallardo, 5 th  Cir. No.  24-10017, Sept.  for $1,200 per ounce. Later that day, on a call with
        27, 2024.                                            Cordaryl Ford, a distributor of methamphetamine,
                                                             Donovan told Ford that he had $10,000 or $11,000
                                                             and wanted Ford to “give [him] what [he] c[ould]”
        EVIDENCE drug possession                             of a methamphetamine delivery that was expected
                                                             to arrive imminently. On May 23, Donovan spoke
        A jury found Donovan and Orlando Bourrage            with Orlando and said he wanted to buy metham-
        guilty of conspiracy to possess methamphetamine      phetamine from Orlando because he had run out,
        with the intent to distribute.  In this appeal, the  but Orlando only had marijuana. Donovan
        defendants raise five issues, arguing that (1) their  responded, “You know I don’t sell that stuff,
        motions to suppress were erroneously denied, (2)     man.”  At the end of the call, Orlando told
        a lead agent in the case should not have been per-   Donovan, “Help me get rid of them if you don’t
        mitted to testify about the meaning of coded lan-    find none,” and Donovan agreed. On May 26,
        guage in conversations about drugs, (3) there was    Ford told Donovan that his supply would “[b]e
        insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict,  here in a couple more days,” and Donovan told
        (4) the district court gave a coercive jury instruc-  Ford that he would buy two pounds of metham-
        tion, and (5) the district court erred in enhancing  phetamine from him once it arrived. On May 28,
        their sentences. We affirm.                          Orlando gave Donovan a “heads up” that Ford had




        28                 www.texaspoliceassociation.com • (512) 458-3140             Texas Police Journal
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37