Page 33 - TPA Journal July August 2021
P. 33

Joe C. Tooley, Legal Digest Editor
                         Joe C. Tooley, Attorneys & Counselors, Rockwall, Texas
                               www.TooleyLaw.com                    972-722-1058


             TEXAS POLICE ASSOCIATION


                                    LEGAL DIGEST




                                         July - August 2021


       AUTHOR’S NOTE:  It is the goal of this submission to extract those portions of relevant appellate
       opinions or the syllabus of the legal reporter which bear directly upon law enforcement methods
       and provide guidance for officers on an operational level. Much of the information pertaining to
       these cases is lifted verbatim from the court opinion or syllabus with independent analysis inserted
       as appropriate.  Due to clarity for training purposes, the distinction between quotes from the
       opinions and inserted analysis is not always identified and legal citations within the opinion are
       often omitted.  Emphasis is placed upon reported decisions from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
       and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.



        EVIDENCE – POSSESSION OF FIREARM BY  A               in possession of the .38 revolver on or about April 29,
        FELON.                                               2019 in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Smith
                                                             pleaded guilty to the charge. In connection with that
        While at a friend’s house,  Tredon Smith touched a   plea, Smith signed a factual basis indicating that he had
        Smith & Wesson .38 caliber revolver. He later pleaded  “touched” the firearm, which the district court accepted
        guilty to being a felon in possession of that firearm in  as a sufficient basis for his conviction. The district court
        violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). In connection with  then sentenced Smith to 57 months of imprisonment,
        his guilty plea, he signed a factual basis document  with three years of supervised release to follow. Smith
        indicating the only interaction he had with the firearm  timely appealed.
        was that he had “touched” it. The district court accepted
        that factual basis as sufficient to sustain Smith’s §  Smith challenges his plea colloquy, primarily co tending
        922(g)(1) conviction. For the following reasons, we  that the district court incorrectly concluded that his
        VACATE Smith’s guilty plea, conviction, and sentence  admission to having “touched” the .38 revolver
        and REMAND for entry of a new plea and necessary     constituted a sufficient basis for possession as required
        proceedings thereafter.                              to sustain a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).

        Midland, Texas police officers arrested Smith after they  Among other requirements, Federal Rule of Criminal
        recovered three stolen firearms on  April 6, 2019.   Procedure 11 requires a federal district court taking a
        Following his arrest, Smith was shown a picture of one  guilty plea to independently evaluate whether the
        of the firearms—a Smith &  Wesson .38 caliber        defendant’s admitted-to conduct actually constitutes a
        revolver—which he admitted to having seen and        violation of the statute under which he is charged.
        touched at a friend’s house. He statedthat he did not  ………….
        remember touching the other firearms.                But where, as here, review is for plain error, we may
        Smith was later arrested and charged with being a felon  also “scan the entire record” for any other facts


        26                 www.texaspoliceassociation.com • (512) 458-3140             Texas Police Journal
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38