Page 32 - January February 2020 TPJ
P. 32

To convict Skaggs of conspiracy to possess with intent  Short appeals the district court’s denial of his motion
        to distribute 50 grams or more of meth, 21 U.S.C. § 846,  for acquittal and the district court’s calculation of the
        the jury was required to find that:                  quantity of drugs attributable to him at sentencing. We
                                                             AFFIRM
                (1) two or more persons agreed to possess meth
                with the intent to distribute it;            Bounds argues that the district court erred in denying
                                                             his motions to substitute counsel…  [This appeal was
                (2) Skaggs knew of the unlawful purpose of the  denied by the Court]
                agreement;
                                                             Herrera
                (3) Skaggs joined in the agreement willfully,
                that is, with intent to further its unlawful  Herrera appeals the district court’s denial of her motion
                purpose;                                     to suppress evidence obtained from a search of two cell
                                                             phones found in her possession.2 She alleges that there
                (4) the overall scope of the conspiracy involved  was no probable cause for a search warrant because the
                at least 50 grams of a mixture containing a  facts in the affidavit supporting the search warrant were
                detectable amount of meth;                   stale and the affidavit supporting the search warrant

                                                             lacked any evidence establishing a nexus between her
        (5) Skaggs knew or reasonably should have known that
                                                             cell phones and ongoing drug activity. She also argues
        the scope of the conspiracy involved at least 50 grams
                                                             that the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule
        of a mixture containing a detectable amount of meth.
                                                             should not apply. We AFFIRM.
         “[A] defendant may be convicted of a conspiracy if the
                                                             Summary of Relevant Facts and Proceedings
        evidence shows that he only participated at one level of
        the conspiracy charged in the indictment, and only    In 2015, the DEA and Homeland Security began
        played a minor role in the conspiracy.”     “The     investigating allegations that Herrera had been
        government does not have to prove that the defendant  distributing meth since October 2014. On June 30,
        knew all of the details of the unlawful enterprise or the  2016, she was arrested. At the time of her arrest, Herrera
        number or identities of all of the co-conspirators, as long  possessed two cell phones—an LG phone and an
        as there is evidence from which the jury could       Alcatel phone, which the government seized. On July
        reasonably infer that the defendant knowingly        5, the government applied for a warrant to search the
        participated in some manner in the overall objective of  phones.  The search warrant application contained an
        the conspiracy.” Id. However, “the government may not  affidavit from Special Agent Perry Moore (“Moore”), a
        prove up a conspiracy merely by presenting evidence  DEA Task Force Officer with the Fort Worth Police
        placing the defendant in a climate of activity that reeks  Department. In it, Agent Moore states that based on his
        of something foul.”                                  knowledge, training, and expertise in investigating
                                                             narcotics offenses, “drug traffickers utilize multiple
        Judge testified that she introduced Skaggs to Bowden,  cellular telephones to conduct drug trafficking
        a supplier named in the indictment. Specifically, Judge
                                                             business,” and “communicate via traditional phone
        explained, “I called [Bowden] and asked her if she
                                                             calls, and the sending/receiving of electronic
        could bring me some dope for my Brownwood people.
                                                             communications via multimedia message service
        She came and she met him.” Judge testified that they
                                                             (MMS) and short message service (SMS) messages.”
        engaged in a transaction involving half a pound of meth.  He further states: In 2014, Agents/Officers received
        This testimony describes an agreement between Skaggs
                                                             information that Nicole HERRERA was currently
        and Bowden, a named co-conspirator, to possess with
                                                             trafficking multiple ounce quantities of crystal
        intent to distribute more than 50 grams of meth, and it,
                                                             methamphetamine in the Fort  Worth,  Texas area.
        along with the other evidence admitted against Skaggs,
                                                             Coconspirator Sarah Kirkpatrick identified Nicole
        is enough to show that a rational trier of fact could have  HERRERA as a methamphetamine distributor who she
        found the essential elements of the crime beyond a
                                                             knew was supplying multi ounce quantities of
        reasonable doubt. We AFFIRM.
                                                             methamphetamine to her boyfriend, another co-

        28                www.texaspoliceassociation.com  •  866-997-8282              Texas Police Journal
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37