Page 34 - TPA Journal January February 2024
P. 34

shut.  When Lt. Nava reached the door, he            Agent Carrasco tried to enter, but the door was
        smelled the strong odor of marijuana and             locked, so the team breached the door and
        could hear “a bunch of movements.”                   found  Appellant alone, completely clothed,
        According to him, it was “obviously more             and standing in a one-to-two-foot space
        than one person — quick movement.” He told           between the toilet and shower.  Appellant
        other agents behind him to keep knocking and         never said anything to police.
        try to contact the occupants while he
        proceeded to Room 15, his assignment, to
        execute the no-knock search warrant.  While          In searching the bathroom, Lt. Nava found a
        Lt. Nava was executing the warrant, Special          loose green leafy substance in the toilet. It had
        Agent Michael Carrasco had continued                 been mixed with water and excrement. He
        directly to Room 18 and started knocking on          also saw some smaller glass pipes at the
        the window. Other officers were already              bottom of the toilet. Lt. Nava believed that
        knocking on the door. Agent Carrasco could           narcotics had been flushed prior to them
        not see anything through the window but              breaching the door and that they found only
        heard the voices of multiple people and a lot of     the remnants of what did not flush.  A
        commotion inside the room, “[l]ike shuffling         photograph of the substance introduced by the
        of whatever they had inside — their clothes or       State appears to show that some of the
        other things.  You could hear like a drawer          substance is still burning. Lt. Nava said that
        trying to close.”   Lt. Nava and Agent Carrasco      they did not collect the loose marijuana
        breached Room 18 together. According to Lt.          because it was only a usable amount that was
        Nava, the room was a mess, with clothing             mixed with water and human waste.  Lt.
        everywhere, “like they had been staying an           Nava agreed with defense counsel that, had
        extended amount of time.” “The room had a            they collected the marijuana, it might have
        very, very strong odor of marijuana,” and in         been able to be tested. Agents arrested all the
        plain view there were “cigarette-type Swisher        occupants for tampering with physical
        Sweets or Phillies or other types of things like     evidence.
        that, they tend to roll marijuana in . . . .” Agent
        Carrasco said that the odor of marijuana “hit
        [him] like a rock.” There was paraphernalia all
        over the room, including a glass pipe                The State indicted  Appellant for tampering
        commonly used to smoke either crack cocaine          with physical evidence, a third-degree felony.
        or methamphetamine. In a drawer were found           TEX. PENAL CODE § 37.09(a)(1).  A jury
        a realistic-looking pistol BB gun and four cell      found  Appellant guilty.  At punishment, the
        phones. According to Lt. Nava, it is typical for     State alleged and Appellant stipulated that he
        narcotics dealers to have multiple cell phones.      had previously been convicted of 11 prior
                                                             felonies.


        There were two females in the immediate
        living area, and Lt. Nava and Agent Carrasco
        heard someone in the bathroom.  Agent                Appellant was subject to between 25 years to
        Carrasco said that he was knocking on the            life confinement as a habitual offender.
        door and announcing himself as a police              The jury sentenced him to 30 years’
        officer while ordering  Appellant out, but           confinement. He iled two motions for new
        Appellant did not answer. Instead,  Agent            trial, and the trial court held three evidentiary
        Carrasco started hearing “shuffling of stuff —       hearings.  The motions were eventually
        feet shuffling and movement.” At that point,
                                                             overruled by operation of law.

        30                 www.texaspoliceassociation.com • (512) 458-3140             Texas Police Journal
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39