Page 44 - 2022 Risk Basics - Radiology
P. 44

SVMIC Risk Basics: Radiology


                          Key Challenge #3: Diagnostic Errors



            Diagnostic error in medicine is a major cause of patient harm, with the

            rate of missed, incorrect, or delayed diagnoses estimated to be as high
            as 10-15 percent. Due to the highly subjective nature of radiographic

            interpretation, the rate is higher for radiology. As we noted in this course’s
            “By the Numbers” section, errors in diagnosis are the most common

            cause of malpractice suits against radiologists, by far.


            Because more than one billion radiographic examinations are performed

            worldwide annually, a 4 percent error rate translates into approximately

            forty million interpretive errors per year.


            Fortunately, most errors are minor or, if significant, are found and

            corrected quickly enough to avoid serious harm to the patient. Yet, many
            interpretation errors do result in harm to patients and also result in

            malpractice lawsuits against and indemnity payments made on behalf of
            radiologists. Here is one example.




                                              C A S E  S T U DY


                 A 58-year-old male was transported to the emergency department
                 after flipping a riding lawnmower over on top of himself. The patient

                 had  thoracic  x-rays  read  by  the  radiologist  as  a  compression

                 fracture at T-10 (which later was discovered to be an injury at T-9,
                 not T-10). Nothing else was noted. The patient was discharged but
                 returned to the ED two days later with complaints of dehydration,

                 inability to void, decreased responsiveness, renal failure, and

                 increased enzymes. A CT of the abdomen was ordered, and the
                 same radiologist interpreted the scan as “unremarkable”. An MRI
                 was ordered a couple of days later revealing a burst fracture at T-9

                 with spinal cord involvement. The patient has permanent motor

                 and neuro deficits.


                                                         Page 44
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49