Page 12 - Anatomy of a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit
P. 12
SVMIC Anatomy of a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit
The burden in a criminal action is considerably higher than in a
civil action. Preponderance of the evidence means a greater
weight of the evidence, or more likely than not. In its simplest
form, consider a balancing scale (such as the scales of justice)
tipping in favor of one side, or a football player crossing the 50-
yard line. If the evidence is even slightly in favor of the plaintiff,
the plaintiff should prevail. However, if the evidence is equal
(the scales are perfectly balanced or the football player only
reaches the 50-yard line), the plaintiff has failed to meet his or
her burden of proof and the case should be dismissed.
The ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ standard in criminal
prosecutions is higher than the 51 percent in civil cases,
although it is not as easily defined in percentages as the civil
‘preponderance of the evidence’ standard and its meaning will
typically vary from juror-to-juror. Fortunately, we do not have to
worry about the criminal burden of proof in civil malpractice
cases.
Regardless of whether you receive notice, a claim, or a lawsuit,
you should report it immediately to your professional liability
carrier and/or risk manager. As will be discussed throughout
this course, the earlier you report a claim or potential claim, the
better prepared your defense can be in the event a lawsuit is
filed. At SVMIC, we strongly encourage our policyholders to
report all events that might lead to a claim or lawsuit to our
Claims Department. This could include an unexpected adverse
outcome, a patient’s verbal threats to “get a lawyer”, or a
known medical error. We do not penalize our policyholders for
reporting potential claims – we encourage it.
Page | 12