Page 16 - 2022 Risk Basics - Anesthesiology
P. 16

SVMIC Risk Basics: Anesthesiology


                   a thorough interview of the patient and/or family members

                   should be conducted, inquiring as to the patient’s history of
                   airway difficulty, snoring, apneic episodes, etc. The responses

                   to the interview need to be noted. A physical exam using a

                   classification system such as Mallampati helps demonstrate
                   that a thorough airway exam was performed. The Mallampati

                   score needs to be documented along with any other pertinent
                   information relating to the airway and/or OSA. If a patient has

                   or is suspected to have OSA, the anesthesiologist should

                   coordinate with the surgeon to develop a protocol for a
                   perioperative management plan. The written anesthesia plan

                   should reflect this protocol.
                                                        5


                   Documentation includes not only writing/typing notes in the
                   record but also reviewing pertinent documentation available to

                   the anesthesia practitioner before beginning a procedure. This
                   includes, but is not limited to, sleep studies, labs, medication

                   allergies, cardiac testing, etc. In the rush to start a procedure,

                   for example, the anesthesiologist may not wait for lab values to
                   return. Pending laboratory tests should not be ignored. For

                   non-emergencies, all preoperative labs that could potentially

                   change your course of action should be available and read. As
                   discussed elsewhere, the EHR’s audit trail will reveal whether

                   or not existing records were accessed. Remember that all lab
                   and diagnostic results will be in the patient’s chart when it is

                   reviewed in a subsequent malpractice case. Retrospectively,
                   you may appear negligent if you have not reviewed all of the

                   information that was potentially available to you. The argument






                   5  http://anesthesiology.pubs.asahq.org/article.aspx?articleid=1917935


                                                         Page | 16
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21