Page 18 - Part 1 Anesthesiology Common Risk Issues
P. 18

SVMIC Anesthesiology: Common Risk Issues


                 Therefore, in patients who have or are suspected to have OSA,

                 a thorough interview of the patient and/or family members
                 should be conducted, inquiring as to the patient’s history of

                 airway difficulty, snoring, apneic episodes, etc. The responses
                 to the interview need to be noted. A physical exam using a

                 classification system such as Mallampati helps demonstrate
                 that a thorough airway exam was performed. The Mallampati

                 score needs to be documented along with any other pertinent
                 information relating to the airway and/or OSA. If a patient

                 has or is suspected to have OSA, the anesthesiologist should
                 coordinate with the surgeon to develop a protocol for a

                 perioperative management plan. The written anesthesia plan
                 should reflect this protocol.        6



                 Documentation includes not only writing/typing notes in the

                 record but also reviewing pertinent documentation available to
                 the anesthesia practitioner before beginning a procedure. These

                 include, but are not limited to, sleep studies, labs, medication
                 allergies, cardiac testing, etc. In the rush to start a procedure,

                 for example, the anesthesiologist may not wait for lab values
                 to return. Pending laboratory tests should not be ignored. For

                 non-emergencies, all pre-operative labs that could potentially
                 change your course of action should be available and read. As

                 discussed elsewhere, the EHR’s audit trail will reveal whether
                 or not existing records were accessed.  Remember that all lab

                 and diagnostic results will be in the patient’s chart when it is
                 reviewed in a subsequent malpractice case. Retrospectively,

                 you may appear negligent if you have not reviewed all of the
                 information that was potentially available to you. The argument

                 that “my surgeon was in a hurry to start the procedure” will not
                 be well-received by a jury.




                 6   http://anesthesiology.pubs.asahq.org/article.aspx?articleid=1917935

                                                         Page 18
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23