Page 67 - OB Risks - Delivering the Goods (Part One)
P. 67

SVMIC Obstetrics Risks: Delivering the Goods




                        On March 7, the patient returned to the office and reported
                        continued pain. Another vaginal exam was performed,

                        and the physician found “vaginal tape” gauze used during

                        the episiotomy repair which had been overlooked in the
                        previous exams. The gauze was removed without difficulty,
                        and the patient was given prescriptions for Doxycycline

                        and Percocet. Her symptoms rapidly improved after the

                        removal of the gauze.





                   This claim is another example of the difficulty a defendant faces
                   when medical judgment issues are called into question and

                   when systems issues create a “piling-on” effect. A key allegation
                   for this patient was that the obstetrician failed to perform an

                   appropriate exam on February 17, requiring her return on March
                   7 for removal of the surgical gauze. The patient also alleged the

                   inappropriate prescribing of Percocet and Doxycycline while she
                   was nursing. Either of these complaints standing alone might

                   have been defensible provided the failed systems issues had not
                   also contributed to the development of the situation.



                   The importance of ensuring a careful count of the gauze,
                   sponge, or other foreign bodies used during a procedure

                   cannot be overemphasized. Regardless of the number of staff

                   participating in the oversight of the supplies, the physician is
                   ultimately responsible and should participate in monitoring the
                   number used. The failure of this system gives the appearance of

                   a poorly organized and careless obstetrician.



                   Additionally, the intraoffice phone-handling process failed. The
                   office did not employ use of a scheduling protocol requiring

                   consultation with the provider when a request for an immediate



                                                          Page 67
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71