Page 132 - THE SLOUGHI REVIEW - ISSUE 13
P. 132

T H E   S L O U G H I   R E V I E W                                                                   1 3 2




        In Kurt Kotrschal's book we find a few important thoughts on domestication. By
        “domestication” Kotrschal means above all the genetic adaptation to humans [76]. In his
        wolf research centre in Ernstbrunn near Vienna, he notes that today's wolves are far less
        aggressive than the traditional portrayal of wolves would have us believe. On the
        contrary, the domesticated dogs have greater aggression potential than the wild
        wolves!



        We humans share communication systems such as sight, hearing and smell with dogs and
        other mammals [77]. Humans and dogs or wolves, however, also share almost the same
        social system: “Both are small group creatures that cooperate very well with each other
        within their clans or packs, not by exerting pressure on each other, but mainly for the

        pleasure of working together. No wonder, since both human clans and wolf packs are usually
        family groups. ... To keep inbreeding at a low level, women have always married into
        neighbouring clans, ... Wolves seem even more flexible than humans in this respect. ... Homo
        sapiens shares with wolves the tendency to wage war against neighbouring groups” [78].



        Kotrschal further: “Wolves only cooperate with individuals in a social group. And the only
        way to establish a social association with wolves is to hand-rear the pups, starting when
        their eyes are still closed. Only then does the basic trust necessary for cooperation develop”

        [79].


        So we see that family formation is an essential part of socialisation, and this is not only
        the case in the defence of herds, as we have seen above, but also in hunting. The mutual
        respectful interaction between animals and humans characterises hunter-gatherer
        cultures. In addition, wolves react to any disrespectful behaviour such as commanding,
        pushing around or even physical punishment with immediate resistance [80].



        This underlines that a Sloughi, which carries these traits even more strongly than a
        representative of a modern selected dog breed, must above all be understood as a social
        being. And this social being Sloughi does not need any training for the desired (hunting)
        activities, he brings along the necessary qualities in the sense of his origin. The older
        Sloughis teach the younger ones the qualities they have brought with them by teaching or

        example in special situations. This can be called “training”. Control and pressure,
        however, spoil the Sloughi and it can then also react aggressively.
   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137