Page 65 - EW FEB 2022
P. 65

dered their bodies unfit for   the “national race”. The   induct feminist popula-  da today about that bogey
             political sovereignty”.   most acute critiques of   tion controllers, such as   — Muslim rates of popula-
                Thus nuptiality,      the population question   Dhanvanthi Rama Rau and   tion growth — continues
             sexuality and reproduc-  came from Radhakamal     Avabai Wadia into drafting   to frame initiatives such as
             tion entered the heart of   Mukherjee and Kamladevi   the First Five Year Plan.   the recent UP and Assam
             discussions around India’s   Chattopadhyay. Sreenivas   Thus India became the   state population policies
             freedom. Were Indians,   quotes Chattopadhyay     first country in the world   and seemingly pays rich
             Hindus in particular, lack-  as saying “masculine-  to have an official, state-  political dividends.
             ing in masculinity? Early   dominated society always   sponsored, family planning   It’s not entirely possible
             Hindu reformers certainly   stresses the importance   programme.          to do justice to a text as
             thought so as they sought   of women as a breeder   Sreenivas traces how   rich as this in the space
             to remake the Hindu male   (sic)”. But with contracep-  the discourse on popula-  of a review. The book is
             body more masculine,     tion, a woman “freed from   tion control was always   recommended reading
             more like their Muslim and   the penalty of undesired   global as much as na-  not just for scholars of
             British ‘conquerors’.    motherhood will deal a   tional. Elite Indian men   modern Indian history, but
                The early Indian      death blow to man’s vested   and women gave it a local   for health and population
             women’s movement under   interest in her. He can no   touch by bringing caste   policy makers, scholars in
             the mentorship of mes-   more chain and enslave   and communalism into    public health and gen-
             siah of medicalised birth   her through children”.  their eugenic arguments.   der studies, students of
             control, Margaret Sanger,   Chattopadhyay’s argu-   Concerns about lower-  demography and popula-
             made an argument for     ments were far ahead of   caste and Muslim rates   tion studies, and of course
             population control both on   her times and fell foul on   of population growth, as   medical sociologists and
             eugenic grounds and on   the ears of male popula-  opposed to upper castes,   medical anthropology.
             the grounds of woman and   tion controlwallahs as   entered the discourse fairly    MOHAN RAO (The Book
             child health to strengthen   policy makers, eager to   early. Hindutva propagan-         Review)















































                                                                             FEBRUARY 2022    EDUCATIONWORLD   65
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68